https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362774
--- Comment #9 from Erik Quaeghebeur ---
(In reply to Erik Quaeghebeur from comment #8)
> (In reply to Ivan Čukić from comment #7)
> >
> > p.s. Nothing here is about the pager specifically.
>
> That is useful to know.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362774
--- Comment #8 from Erik Quaeghebeur ---
(In reply to Ivan Čukić from comment #7)
>
> Not as simple as that.
Thanks for the further explanation.
> p.s. Nothing here is about the pager specifically.
That is useful
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362774
--- Comment #7 from Ivan Čukić ---
> But adding an integer for the order to whatever object represents the activity
Not as simple as that. That integer needs to be synchronized across all
clients, to be introduced in a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362774
Erik Quaeghebeur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362774
Ivan Čukić changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Latest Commit|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362774
Ivan Čukić changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362774
skywatche...@hotmail.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skywatche...@hotmail.fr
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362774
--- Comment #3 from Steve Phelps ---
Alphabetic ordering is not ideal. It is not unreasonable for users to have a
preference over the ordering. For example, if two activities are related, and
the ordering can be configured, then
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362774
--- Comment #2 from Ivan Čukić ---
@Kai - activities in the switcher, yes, but in other places they use UUID
ordering which is not really a good idea :)
I think an alphabetic ordering will be sufficient for the other places.
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362774
Kai Uwe Broulik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ivan.cu...@kde.org,
10 matches
Mail list logo