[valgrind] [Bug 327881] False Positive Warning on std::atomic_bool
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327881 Jan Niklas Hasse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jha...@bixense.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 327881] False Positive Warning on std::atomic_bool
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327881 Paul Floyd changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pjfl...@wanadoo.fr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 327881] False Positive Warning on std::atomic_bool
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327881 David Faure changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fa...@kde.org --- Comment #3 from David Faure --- At least on x86, yes, there suppression files are the only solution since the CPU takes care of cache synchronization so non-atomic read/writes lead to the same assembly as atomic read/writes. On other architectures like ARM we probably don't want such suppressions to be enabled. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 327881] False Positive Warning on std::atomic_bool
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327881 Milian Wolff changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Milian Wolff --- I can confirm this behavior, seems like the suppression files must be extended to ignore anything happening within std::atomic* ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
