[valgrind] [Bug 344524] store conditional of guest applications always fail - observed on Octeon3(MIPS)

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344524 --- Comment #20 from Maran Pakkirisamy --- Sorry, just now I noticed this update. And then found in bug #369459 that the issues are taken care and fixed. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[valgrind] [Bug 344524] store conditional of guest applications always fail - observed on Octeon3(MIPS)

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344524 --- Comment #19 from Julian Seward --- Hmm, even that is too relaxed, because it doesn't reject mismatched load vs store sizes. Here's a variant that does check sizes, and uses size == 0 to mean "no transaction pending".

[valgrind] [Bug 344524] store conditional of guest applications always fail - observed on Octeon3(MIPS)

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344524 --- Comment #18 from Julian Seward --- Actually, I'd prefer to have it so that any attempt to do StoreCond will cause all following attempts to fail, up until a new LoadLinked is done. How does that sound? LoadLinked(addr)

[valgrind] [Bug 344524] store conditional of guest applications always fail - observed on Octeon3(MIPS)

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344524 --- Comment #17 from Julian Seward --- Also, your implementation uses guest_state.LLaddr == 0 to mean "there is no transaction in progress". So guest_state.LLaddr == 0 has a special meaning that is different from all other values.

[valgrind] [Bug 344524] store conditional of guest applications always fail - observed on Octeon3(MIPS)

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344524 --- Comment #16 from Julian Seward --- (In reply to Maran Pakkirisamy from comment #8) Maran, I was studying this bug and your fix, so as to see how to apply it to ARM. I have a question: > With the update, only step 3 is changed. >

[valgrind] [Bug 344524] store conditional of guest applications always fail - observed on Octeon3(MIPS)

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344524 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[valgrind] [Bug 344524] store conditional of guest applications always fail - observed on Octeon3(MIPS)

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344524 --- Comment #15 from Petar Jovanovic --- We should close this issue now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 344524] store conditional of guest applications always fail - observed on Octeon3(MIPS)

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344524 Petar Jovanovic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mips3...@gmail.com ---

[valgrind] [Bug 344524] store conditional of guest applications always fail - observed on Octeon3(MIPS)

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344524 --- Comment #13 from Maran Pakkirisamy --- Our internal team continuously regtests V with the patch (solution in comments 9 and 10) and also ships the package. No issues related to this bug has been reported so

[valgrind] [Bug 344524] store conditional of guest applications always fail - observed on Octeon3(MIPS)

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344524 --- Comment #12 from Julian Seward --- Maran, the same problem has been reported for ARM64/OCTEON3 at https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369459. So let me ask: how well does your proposed solution in comments 9 and 10 work? Did