https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
--- Comment #29 from Cyp ---
It is now. And seems to work, thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
--- Comment #28 from Tom Hughes ---
That latest change isn't actually committed yet ;-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
--- Comment #27 from Julian Seward ---
That doesn't invalidate Tom's comment though: you should always test
with CPUID at run time for the presence of any particular instruction
set extension, before using it. Especially for recent or obscure
extension
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
--- Comment #26 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Tom Hughes from comment #25)
> So actually there is a later commit which does actually implement RDRAND but
> only for AVX2 capable CPUs which yours is not.
I think Mark just fixed it to work on AVX-
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
--- Comment #25 from Tom Hughes ---
So actually there is a later commit which does actually implement RDRAND but
only for AVX2 capable CPUs which yours is not. My other point remains correct,
that we won't advertise RDRAND on any machine where we don't
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
--- Comment #24 from Tom Hughes ---
That's badly written - they are not supported but this bug is resolved by
making valgrind's emulation of the cpuid instruction remove the bit which
claims support for them.
So an application which tests for rdrand be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
Cyp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cyp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #23 from Cyp ---
I'm seeing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||for...@prenav.com
--- Comment #22 from Mark Wie
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sebastian.groth@enervision.
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cj-...@zougloub.eu
--- Comment #20 from Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mathias.cabiochdelalande@gm
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
danilo.borq...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danilo.borq...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ezy...@mit.edu
--- Comment #18 from Tom Hughes --
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc.h...@gmail.com
--- Comment #17 from Mark Wi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliusde...@gmail.com
--- Comment #16 from Tom Hug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cochamb...@tycoint.com
--- Comment #15 from Tom Hu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@kinomoto.me
--- Comment #14 from Julian Se
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brat...@opera.com
--- Comment #13 from Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||miabr...@gmail.com
--- Comment #12 from Mark Wi
19 matches
Mail list logo
