[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2018-02-14 Thread Julian Seward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 --- Comment #20 from Julian Seward --- The implementation may be buggy. Details in bug 384930. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2017-05-18 Thread Ivo Raisr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 --- Comment #19 from Ivo Raisr --- And follow up VEX commit in SVN r3376. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2017-05-17 Thread Ivo Raisr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 --- Comment #18 from Ivo Raisr --- Follow up fix in SVN r16393. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2017-05-15 Thread Julian Seward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 --- Comment #17 from Julian Seward --- Ah yes, I remembered about this and then forgot it again. The test case uses ADOX etc, and runs unconditionally, but the fix only decodes them on AVX2 capable machines and above. So the test

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2017-05-15 Thread Ivo Raisr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 Ivo Raisr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iv...@ivosh.net --- Comment #16

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2017-05-14 Thread Julian Seward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 Julian Seward changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2017-05-12 Thread Julian Seward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 --- Comment #14 from Julian Seward --- (In reply to jacobly.alt from comment #5) > Created attachment 105193 [details] > Fixed 32-bit instructions in test-amd64. Committed, with modifications, vex r3365. Thanks for the patch. Note

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2017-05-09 Thread Ivo Raisr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 Ivo Raisr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@cyrilbouvier.fr --- Comment

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2017-04-26 Thread Jeffrey Walton
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 --- Comment #12 from Jeffrey Walton --- This question came up on the Fedora bug report... Why was the patch not accepted? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2017-04-26 Thread Jeffrey Walton
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 --- Comment #11 from Jeffrey Walton --- Here's the reduced test case. $ cat test.c #include int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { uint32_t a = argc*4, b = argc*8; asm ("adcxl %1, %0" : "+r"(a) : "rm"(b)); return a & 0xf;

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2017-04-25 Thread Jeffrey Walton
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to jacobly.alt from comment #9) > Considering the new patch didn't change any valgrind code, I'm going to > assume the patch was just too old to apply properly to trunk. Oh, my

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2017-04-25 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 --- Comment #9 from jacobly@gmail.com --- Considering the new patch didn't change any valgrind code, I'm going to assume the patch was just too old to apply properly to trunk. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2017-04-25 Thread Jeffrey Walton
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to jacobly.alt from comment #5) > Created attachment 105193 [details] > Fixed 32-bit instructions in test-amd64. > > I disassembled the test program and noticed that 32-bit

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2017-04-25 Thread Jeffrey Walton
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #6) > (In reply to jacobly.alt from comment #5) > > Created attachment 105193 [details] > > Fixed 32-bit instructions in test-amd64. > > > > ... > > >

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2017-04-25 Thread Jeffrey Walton
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to jacobly.alt from comment #5) > Created attachment 105193 [details] > Fixed 32-bit instructions in test-amd64. > > I disassembled the test program and noticed that 32-bit

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2017-04-25 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 jacobly@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #97845|0 |1 is obsolete|

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2017-04-25 Thread Jeffrey Walton
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey Walton --- I'm working from the SVN sources, and the issue still exists. It appears something is amiss with the patch. The program was built with Clang on a Skylake machine. Its not in the big integer

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2017-04-25 Thread Jeffrey Walton
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 Jeffrey Walton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||noloa...@gmail.com --

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2016-11-11 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 --- Comment #3 from jacobly@gmail.com --- Julian Seward, I think these instructions are only on Intel processors, so the only way to get them is to compile with -march=native or similar. Since I compiled my glibc with -march=native, it contains

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2016-07-20 Thread Julian Seward via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 --- Comment #2 from Julian Seward --- jacobly.alt, what context (library, use case, etc) do these instructions appear in? I am surprised they don't get complained-about more. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2016-03-11 Thread via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 --- Comment #1 from jacobly@gmail.com --- Created attachment 97845 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=97845=edit Adds ADCX and ADOX to VEX. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 360415] amd64 instructions ADCX and ADOX are not implemented in VEX

2016-03-11 Thread via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360415 jacobly@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |3.12 SVN -- You are receiving this