On 19.07.08 10:28:41, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Saturday 19 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
...
and more importantly make Debugfull work with CMake 2.6. As I didn't
find a reference of CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES for cmake 2.4 I've set it
only for 2.6. Please can you have a look at the
On Saturday 19 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 19.07.08 10:28:41, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Saturday 19 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
...
and more importantly make Debugfull work with CMake 2.6. As I didn't
find a reference of CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES for cmake 2.4 I've
On Friday 18 July 2008 23:38:45 Brad King wrote:
Matthias Kretz wrote:
attached is a patch to use the new automoc macro which adds a new target
per default on Windows.
Can someone point me to discussion of the original problem, please?
I think most of this was in german and private mail.
Matthias Kretz schrieb:
On Friday 18 July 2008 23:38:45 Brad King wrote:
Matthias Kretz wrote:
attached is a patch to use the new automoc macro which adds a new target
per default on Windows.
Can someone point me to discussion of the original problem, please?
I think most of this was in
On 18.07.08 18:26:58, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Damn, actually I have a slight feeling I've asked this already. Any
objections against putting this information close to the gcc-version of
setting the flags. So neither I nor anybody else need to ask stupid
questions again?
Matthias Kretz schrieb:
Hi,
attached is a patch to use the new automoc macro which adds a new target per
default on Windows.
Please let me know if that is what you want/need and whether I should commit
this.
The patch doesn't look correct to me:
@@ -672,7 +679,11 @@
On Saturday 19 July 2008 12:52:57 Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
Matthias Kretz schrieb:
Hi,
attached is a patch to use the new automoc macro which adds a new target
per default on Windows.
Please let me know if that is what you want/need and whether I should
commit this.
The patch
Matthias Kretz wrote:
On Friday 18 July 2008 23:38:45 Brad King wrote:
Can someone point me to discussion of the original problem, please?
I think most of this was in german and private mail. So here's a summary:
Okay, thanks.
-Brad
___
Matthias Kretz wrote:
- With that make does what I want: execute automoc4 once per target on
every call to make. If automoc4 decides there's nothing to do it
doesn't touch any files and so make decides not to recompile the output
file of automoc4.
So you have basically the rule:
target:
Thiago Macieira schrieb:
Matthias Kretz wrote:
- With that make does what I want: execute automoc4 once per target on
every call to make. If automoc4 decides there's nothing to do it
doesn't touch any files and so make decides not to recompile the output
file of automoc4.
So you have
10 matches
Mail list logo