Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 28.09.09 16:08:22, Brad King wrote: Andreas Pakulat wrote: On 25.09.09 16:07:21, Bill Hoffman wrote: I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/. I am sure I am leaving something out,

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread David Cole
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Andreas Pakulat ap...@gmx.de wrote: On 28.09.09 16:08:22, Brad King wrote: Andreas Pakulat wrote: On 25.09.09 16:07:21, Bill Hoffman wrote: I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You can find the source and binaries here:

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Bill Hoffman
David Cole wrote: Thanks for the info, I'll fix the project later. I believe however that I didn't see any warnings, which should now be posted if I understood correctly? Or is that part of the OLD behaviour still working? If you set the policty to OLD, you should just

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 29.09.09 09:26:30, Andreas Pakulat wrote: On 28.09.09 16:08:22, Brad King wrote: Andreas Pakulat wrote: On 25.09.09 16:07:21, Bill Hoffman wrote: I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You can find the source and binaries here:

Re: Is there a hook in cmake to test-compile things after an installation?

2009-09-29 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 29 September 2009, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: Hi, to ensure that example code showing how to use a library is up-to-date (and/or the installed headers/libs are okay) I would like to have that code automatically test-compiled directly after an installation of the headers/lib

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 29.09.09 19:24:54, Alexander Neundorf wrote: On Tuesday 29 September 2009, Bill Hoffman wrote: David Cole wrote: Thanks for the info, I'll fix the project later. I believe however that I didn't see any warnings, which should now be posted if I understood

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 29 September 2009, Andreas Pakulat wrote: On 29.09.09 19:24:54, Alexander Neundorf wrote: ... Doesn't that imply that we will always need the 2.4.x behaviour for all of KDE 4.x ? I mean, if I set some property to NEW, which may change some behaviour, the developer may have to

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote: I guess we will with it, because I don't really see a difference between source compatibility for C++ files and for CMake files. In both cases, if it's broken, the package will not compile. Do we promise source

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 29 September 2009, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote: I guess we will with it, because I don't really see a difference between source compatibility for C++ files and for CMake files. In both cases, if

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Matt Williams
2009/9/29 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net: On Tuesday 29 September 2009, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote: I guess we will with it, because I don't really see a difference between source compatibility

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Michael Pyne
On Tuesday 29 September 2009 16:05:38 Matt Williams wrote: 2009/9/29 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net: On Tuesday 29 September 2009, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote: I guess we will with it, because