Re: Review Request: Remove checks for sip, pyqt4 and pykde4. They are unneeded.

2012-05-02 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104619/#review13213 --- This review has been submitted with commit

Re: Review Request: Control optional Xinerama support

2012-05-02 Thread Alexander Neundorf
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104698/#review13276 --- Ship it! Looks like it should be ok. - Alexander Neundorf

Re: Review Request: Control optional Xinerama support

2012-05-02 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104698/#review13277 --- This review has been submitted with commit

Re: Review Request: Control optional Xinerama support

2012-05-02 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104698/#review13278 --- This review has been submitted with commit

Should the library version follow the KDE release version?

2012-05-02 Thread Stefan Majewsky
Hi, I'm currently working on the libkdegames build system. For a major cleanup, libkdegames is breaking source and binary compatibility in the 4.9 release. I figured this is the right time to move away from a self-installed find-script to a ProjectConfig.cmake file. Now I'm wondering about the

Re: Should the library version follow the KDE release version?

2012-05-02 Thread Andreas Pakulat
Hi, On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Stefan Majewsky stefan.majew...@googlemail.com wrote: I'm currently working on the libkdegames build system. For a major cleanup, libkdegames is breaking source and binary compatibility in the 4.9 release. I figured this is the right time to move away from