On Sunday 11 July 2010, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Thu July 8 2010 17:36:09 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
Hello
From what I understand, Plasma in KDE4 Workspace 4.5 relies on
notifications provided by libdbusmenu-qt to control what to draw in
system tray. And apparently Qt = Qt-4.6.2 contains
2010/7/11 Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org:
On Thu July 8 2010 17:36:09 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
Hello
From what I understand, Plasma in KDE4 Workspace 4.5 relies on
notifications provided by libdbusmenu-qt to control what to draw in system
tray. And apparently Qt = Qt-4.6.2 contains known bug
On Thu July 8 2010 17:36:09 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
Hello
From what I understand, Plasma in KDE4 Workspace 4.5 relies on
notifications provided by libdbusmenu-qt to control what to draw in system
tray. And apparently Qt = Qt-4.6.2 contains known bug that causes 'close
application'
Hello
From what I understand, Plasma in KDE4 Workspace 4.5 relies on notifications
provided by libdbusmenu-qt to control what to draw in system tray. And
apparently Qt = Qt-4.6.2 contains known bug that causes 'close application'
notifications not to be delivered - as a result causing system
On 08.07.10 17:36:09, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
Hello
From what I understand, Plasma in KDE4 Workspace 4.5 relies on notifications
provided by libdbusmenu-qt to control what to draw in system tray. And
apparently Qt = Qt-4.6.2 contains known bug that causes 'close application'
On Thursday 08 of July 2010 17:51:31 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 08.07.10 17:36:09, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
Hello
From what I understand, Plasma in KDE4 Workspace 4.5 relies on
notifications
provided by libdbusmenu-qt to control what to draw in system tray. And
apparently Qt =
On Thursday 8. July 2010 18.42.36 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
The question is: who cares whether Qt minor releases are interchangeable
or not so that we can just specify minimal required dependencies to
ensure only that stuff compiles?
the build-time dependency should only be a minor release of
On Thursday 08 of July 2010 19:28:01 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Thursday 8. July 2010 18.42.36 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
The question is: who cares whether Qt minor releases are interchangeable
or not so that we can just specify minimal required dependencies to
ensure only that stuff
Hi,
2010/7/8 Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gmail.com
On Thursday 08 of July 2010 19:28:01 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Thursday 8. July 2010 18.42.36 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
The question is: who cares whether Qt minor releases are
interchangeable
or not so that we can just specify minimal
On 08.07.10 20:14:47, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
On Thursday 08 of July 2010 19:28:01 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Thursday 8. July 2010 18.42.36 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
The question is: who cares whether Qt minor releases are interchangeable
or not so that we can just specify minimal required
On Thursday 8. July 2010 20.14.47 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
Right. But those users who will go through this exact same procedure over
and over AGAIN. Because:
- they weren't told Qt-4.6.2 is broken in this regard (why would they? they
just grab packages and build from source against whatever Qt
On Thursday 08 July 2010, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
On Thursday 08 of July 2010 19:28:01 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Thursday 8. July 2010 18.42.36 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
The question is: who cares whether Qt minor releases are
interchangeable or not so that we can just specify minimal
On Thursday 08 July 2010, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Thursday 08 July 2010, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
On Thursday 08 of July 2010 19:28:01 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Thursday 8. July 2010 18.42.36 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
The question is: who cares whether Qt minor releases are
13 matches
Mail list logo
