---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115210/#review47983
---
Until now we had no problems with the data installed to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115099/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2014, 9:21 a.m.)
Review request for Build System,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115211/#review47996
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On Jan. 22, 2014,
On Jan. 21, 2014, 11:02 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
modules/ECMGeneratePriFile.cmake, line 13
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115099/diff/1/?file=234571#file234571line13
I feel DEPS should really be a list, but CMake apparently doesn't have
a join function, for some bizarre reason
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115099/#review48008
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alex Merry
On Jan. 22, 2014, 9:21
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115211/#review48009
---
Ship it!
This seems sensible to me; however, I do wonder if
On Jan. 22, 2014, 12:08 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
This seems sensible to me; however, I do wonder if ECM should also provide
an ecm_mark_gui_executable function as well (I'm thinking of the case where
most of the tests should be non-gui, but a handful want to display widgets).
Well, we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115221/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2014, 12:32 p.m.)
Review request for Build System, KDE
On Jan. 22, 2014, 12:08 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
This seems sensible to me; however, I do wonder if ECM should also provide
an ecm_mark_gui_executable function as well (I'm thinking of the case where
most of the tests should be non-gui, but a handful want to display widgets).
Aleix
On Jan. 22, 2014, 12:08 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
This seems sensible to me; however, I do wonder if ECM should also provide
an ecm_mark_gui_executable function as well (I'm thinking of the case where
most of the tests should be non-gui, but a handful want to display widgets).
Aleix
On Jan. 22, 2014, 9:22 a.m., Patrick von Reth wrote:
Until now we had no problems with the data installed to bin/../share and
this setup would make it impossible to have multiple independent kde
setups on one system.
Alexander Richardson wrote:
I know. The problem is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115211/#review48036
---
This review has been submitted with commit
On Jan. 22, 2014, 3:20 p.m., Michael Palimaka wrote:
This is already handled by extra-cmake-modules, or am I missing something?
maybe this is me that miss something, but i am using last ecm.
- Nicolas
---
This is an automatically
On Jan. 22, 2014, 3:20 p.m., Michael Palimaka wrote:
This is already handled by extra-cmake-modules, or am I missing something?
Nicolas Lécureuil wrote:
maybe this is me that miss something, but i am using last ecm.
Here is the change, and it should be part of 0.0.9:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115234/
---
Review request for Build System, Extra Cmake Modules and KDE Frameworks.
On quarta-feira, 22 de janeiro de 2014 11:02:55, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Only set QT_STRICT_ITERATORS when not compiling with MSVC
On MSVC linker errors will happen when this flag is set.
Or I could apply a fix to Qt too.
Fix submitted for review:
On Jan. 22, 2014, 9:08 a.m., Alex Merry wrote:
This seems sensible to me; however, I do wonder if ECM should also provide
an ecm_mark_gui_executable function as well (I'm thinking of the case where
most of the tests should be non-gui, but a handful want to display widgets).
Aleix Pol
17 matches
Mail list logo