Re: Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-28 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 08:50:12 +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote: On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: Is build.kde.org now using the release branch of cmake.git instead of the next branch? When/why did that change? This was changed around about

Re: [cmake-developers] Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-28 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 09:58:58 +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote: If anyone is interested, help would be appreciated to get a Contracts style build up and running. In particular, pointers to documentation on how to perform such builds would be appreciated - we'll need to run make install for parts

Re: Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-28 Thread Marko Käning
Earlier this year, I was working on lots of performance metrics of CMake and this was part of it. There ended up being more than a dozen branches resulting from that work (some of them still unmerged). Doing some digging shows that this is where the commit finally hit master: commit

Re: Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-27 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: Ben Cooksley wrote: On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: Is build.kde.org now using the release branch of cmake.git instead of the next branch? When/why did that change? This was

Re: Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-26 Thread Albert Astals Cid
Hi guys, what's the status of this? As far as i can see it's still unresolved since kcoreaddons is installing much fewer headers than it used to http://build.kde.org/job/kcoreaddons_master_qt5/153/console vs http://build.kde.org/job/kcoreaddons_master_qt5/152/console Do you think it's a

Re: Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-26 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: Hi guys, what's the status of this? Hi Albert, I'm waiting for the fixes for this issue, in particular http://www.cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commit;h=5f414cefb6524d26329484b296004e3c2d97ec4f to land in 'release'. Once

Re: Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-25 Thread Stephen Kelly
Ben Cooksley wrote: On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: Is build.kde.org now using the release branch of cmake.git instead of the next branch? When/why did that change? This was changed around about

Re: Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-24 Thread Stephen Kelly
Ben Cooksley wrote: Hi all, It would appear that CMake 3.0 to 3.1 introduces a colossal change in behaviour. This change totally breaks all KDE projects which use Extra-CMake-Modules, as necessary headers are no longer installed. This has become an issue following

Re: Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-24 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: Ben Cooksley wrote: Hi all, It would appear that CMake 3.0 to 3.1 introduces a colossal change in behaviour. This change totally breaks all KDE projects which use Extra-CMake-Modules, as necessary headers are no longer

Re: Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-24 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Friday, October 24, 2014 18:44:32 Stephen Kelly wrote: Ben Cooksley wrote: Hi all, It would appear that CMake 3.0 to 3.1 introduces a colossal change in behaviour. This change totally breaks all KDE projects which use Extra-CMake-Modules, as necessary headers are no longer

Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-23 Thread Ben Cooksley
Hi all, It would appear that CMake 3.0 to 3.1 introduces a colossal change in behaviour. This change totally breaks all KDE projects which use Extra-CMake-Modules, as necessary headers are no longer installed. This has become an issue following http://build.kde.org/job/cmake/160/ which has led

Re: Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-23 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote: Hi all, It would appear that CMake 3.0 to 3.1 introduces a colossal change in behaviour. This change totally breaks all KDE projects which use Extra-CMake-Modules, as necessary headers are no longer installed. This has

Re: Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-23 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 10/23/2014 5:11 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote: And it would seem that the CMake developers prefer to live in their own closed off little bubble. Sorry about that. We just want to avoid spam. I have forwarded your message to the cmake-developers mailing list. Thanks for the report. -Bill

Re: Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-23 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote: On 10/23/2014 5:11 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote: And it would seem that the CMake developers prefer to live in their own closed off little bubble. Hi Bill, Sorry about that. We just want to avoid spam. I have

Re: Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-23 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote: On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote: Hi all, It would appear that CMake 3.0 to 3.1 introduces a colossal change in behaviour. This change totally breaks all KDE projects which use