On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Cornelius Schumacher
wrote:
> As it already was mentioned in the thread we should not focus on criteria who
> and what to keep out, but we should focus on what drives us forward.
That's exactly our "focused" group point. How the vague and
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
> I honestly still find it strange that in this discussion we insist on
> drawing a circle defining "what is/can be KDE" (which, once more, is not
> what the vision would be supposed to mean) way smaller than what KDE
> Honestly, after all these words, I don't think that this is a "focused"
> vision, but more of an "exclusive" one (from the verb "to exclude"). In my
> opinion this somehow invalidates the proposal itself, as it will be
> inapplicable to already existing, live and vibrant KDE projects.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> Why should there be a line?
I've been managing software development organizations since 2008. I
attest to the importance of drawing a line. There's so much you can do
with software. Unless you learn to say "no", you
Hi,
On Friday, February 12, 2016 08:04:10 Martin Graesslin wrote:
> On Thursday, February 11, 2016 10:06:33 PM CET Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 11, 2016 10:06:57 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 10:08:19 PM Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > > On
On Freitag, 12. Februar 2016 12:07:27 CET Alexander Dymo wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Martin Graesslin
wrote:
> > Why should there be a line?
>
> I've been managing software development organizations since 2008. I
> attest to the importance of drawing a line.
sent to wrong mailinglist by mistake ...--- Begin Message ---
Hi all,
many thanks to all people that have worked on the vision proposals and to
everyone who contributed thoughts.
I would like to chime in with an aspect that I feel is missing so far.
This additional aspect is closely related to
On Friday, February 12, 2016 21:00:37 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
...
> Maybe what you want is an overarching product vision instead of a community
> vision, after all?
I think I can answer at least for everybody from the alternative-draft team,
maybe also for the people who want more "direction" in
On Feb 12, 2016 9:14 PM, "Alexander Neundorf" wrote:
>
> On Friday, February 12, 2016 21:00:37 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> ...
> > Maybe what you want is an overarching product vision instead of a
community
> > vision, after all?
>
> I think I can answer at least for everybody from
On Friday, February 12, 2016 21:37:23 Clemens Toennies wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2016 9:14 PM, "Alexander Neundorf" wrote:
> > On Friday, February 12, 2016 21:00:37 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > Maybe what you want is an overarching product vision instead of a
>
>
On Thursday, February 11, 2016 10:17:03 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 09:42:31 PM Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > > Also, what do you think about the relation between vision and mission
> > > > ?
> > >
> > > When I joined the "vision team", my original proposal was to
On Feb 12, 2016 9:56 PM, "Alexander Dymo" wrote:
>
> >> Maybe what you want is an overarching product vision instead of a
community
> >> vision, after all?
> >
> > I think I can answer at least for everybody from the alternative-draft
team,
> > maybe also for the people who
On Feb 12, 2016 9:15 PM, "Alexander Neundorf" wrote:
>
> On Thursday, February 11, 2016 10:17:03 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > In a do-ocracy such as KDE, you take part and are able to influence
> > direction, or you stand at the sidelines and watch, but you don't stand
at
> > the
On Feb 12, 2016 10:10 PM, "Alexander Neundorf" wrote:
>
> On Friday, February 12, 2016 21:37:23 Clemens Toennies wrote:
> > On Feb 12, 2016 9:14 PM, "Alexander Neundorf" wrote:
> > > On Friday, February 12, 2016 21:00:37 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
On Feb 12, 2016 9:58 PM, "Alexander Dymo" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Clemens Toennies
> wrote:
> > And you're "overarching (product) vision" to be adopted by all of KDE
would
> > have to specifically mention "based on Qt"?
>
15 matches
Mail list logo