Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-04 Thread Luca Beltrame
Il giorno Tue, 04 Jul 2017 23:04:08 +0200 Christian Mollekopf ha scritto: > * it should be ok to release from playground for years, or even > potentially forever. That would impact translations, and IMO it can be easily abused as a "get out of jail free" card that avoids

Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-04 Thread Luigi Toscano
Christian Mollekopf ha scritto: > > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017, at 11:16 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote: >> Christian Mollekopf ha scritto: >>> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017, at 01:20 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: The applications lifecycle policy needs an update Is this a good current state of it or are

Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-04 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Tuesday 04 July 2017 23:34:20 Christian Mollekopf wrote: > What I meant to propose was more that instead of being initially in a > temporary location, > and then having to choose one of "proper" ones and go through review, > we would instead > start with a permanent location and then you

Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-04 Thread Christian Mollekopf
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017, at 11:16 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote: > Christian Mollekopf ha scritto: > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017, at 01:20 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > >> The applications lifecycle policy needs an update > >> > >> Is this a good current state of it or are there more stages? > >> > >>

Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-04 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Christian Mollekopf wrote: > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017, at 01:20 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: >> The applications lifecycle policy needs an update >> >> Is this a good current state of it or are there more stages? >> >>

Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-04 Thread Luigi Toscano
Christian Mollekopf ha scritto: > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017, at 01:20 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: >> The applications lifecycle policy needs an update >> >> Is this a good current state of it or are there more stages? >> >> https://community.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle/Draft >> > > Looks

Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-04 Thread Christian Mollekopf
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017, at 01:20 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > The applications lifecycle policy needs an update > > Is this a good current state of it or are there more stages? > > https://community.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle/Draft > Looks good to me for what it currently is. In

Re: latest draft for mission (and strategy)

2017-07-04 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On 2017 M07 2, Sun 03:43:57 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: ... > In my opinion our answer to "where we want to go" was supposed to be > something else than "nowhere in particular". Then I think we're falling > very short on that. We face a problem, and instead of putting our efforts > to find where to

Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-04 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 01:43:32PM +0200, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, > > On Tuesday, 4 July 2017 13:20:43 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > The applications lifecycle policy needs an update > > > > Is this a good current state of it or are there more stages? > > > >

Re: [kde-community] Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-04 Thread Luigi Toscano
On Tuesday, 4 July 2017 14:27:07 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 02:24:30PM +0200, Luigi Toscano wrote: > > Are we focusing on the graph for now, and then we can move to the content > > of the page, or can we start the general discussion as well? > > Go wild :) > I think

Re: [kde-community] Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-04 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 02:24:30PM +0200, Luigi Toscano wrote: > Are we focusing on the graph for now, and then we can move to the content of > the page, or can we start the general discussion as well? Go wild :) Jonathan

Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-04 Thread Luigi Toscano
On Tuesday, 4 July 2017 13:20:43 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > The applications lifecycle policy needs an update > > Is this a good current state of it or are there more stages? > > https://community.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle/Draft Are we focusing on the graph for now, and then we

Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-04 Thread Harald Sitter
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, > > On Tuesday, 4 July 2017 13:20:43 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: >> The applications lifecycle policy needs an update >> >> Is this a good current state of it or are there more stages? >> >>

Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-04 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Tuesday, 4 July 2017 13:20:43 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > The applications lifecycle policy needs an update > > Is this a good current state of it or are there more stages? > > https://community.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle/Draft Didn't we have cases of applications