On 08/12/2017 04:22 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2017, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
>
>> Here's a radical proposal: why don't we just work towards improving the IRC
>> protocol, make the protocol available over WebSockets, and try to push the
>> whole thing as a W3C informational RFC?
>
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
> Here's a radical proposal: why don't we just work towards improving the IRC
> protocol, make the protocol available over WebSockets, and try to push the
> whole thing as a W3C informational RFC?
Best idea yet!
--
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.krita.o
Here's a radical proposal: why don't we just work towards improving the IRC
protocol, make the protocol available over WebSockets, and try to push the
whole thing as a W3C informational RFC?
On 10 Aug 2017 10:18 pm, "Eike Hein" wrote:
> On August 11, 2017 4:22:04 AM GMT+09:00, Thomas Pfeiffer <
Am Freitag, 11. August 2017, 21:49:11 CEST schrieb Eike Hein:
> I've given some more thought to Matrix as a contender and I'm
> increasingly liking this option among the available contenders.
>
> [...]
There are currently various issues with the bridge including missing protocol
support (e.g. i
On venerdì 11 agosto 2017 16:25:40 CEST, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
On 11 August 2017 at 13:49, Eike Hein wrote:
I've given some more thought to Matrix as a contender and I'm
increasingly liking this option among the available contenders.
Am I right in thinking that the bridging in Matrix/Riot i
On 11 August 2017 at 13:49, Eike Hein wrote:
> I've given some more thought to Matrix as a contender and I'm
> increasingly liking this option among the available contenders.
Am I right in thinking that the bridging in Matrix/Riot isn't the same
as various IRC/Telegram channels have where message
I've given some more thought to Matrix as a contender and I'm
increasingly liking this option among the available contenders.
The available Matrix clients are currently not quite as polished
as their competition (specifically Slack/Discord), but Matrix
does have their features in its scope, inclu
Ben Cooksley:
I've now investigated and have corrected the issue
Now it works. Thanks all for your help 👍
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Harald Sitter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
>> Perhaps we should ask sitter what kinds of scratch repo's those were, and
>> whether he would have created them on KDE infra, if there was a similarly
>> simple one-click way to c
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Aaron Honeycutt wrote:
> Odd I just logged in fine.
>
Hi Aaron,
Due to the nature of how the wikis connect to Phabricator sometimes people
are unable to login while others are.
This is due to metadata which describes the account link getting mangled -
usually d
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella
wrote:
> Aaron Honeycutt:
>>
>> Odd I just logged in fine.
>
>
> You here! Hahaha!
>
> Well, it seems I bricked the account somehow.
Hi Alberto,
I've now investigated and have corrected the issue which was blocking
your login to the wikis.
On Thursday 10 August 2017 21:34:19 Christian Loosli wrote:
> People pointed out, various times by now, that IRC is the
> lowest common denominator and that the rest not only can be bridged, but is
> bridged.
The requirements list can also be used to check whether the bridges support
all t
Luigi says it well: there is a point to this exercise in figuring out what is
desired / required of an IM system. That can be interesting in and of itself
-- I've gone and interviewed my daughter on her use of different IM systems,
and found a whole hierarchy of needs and fine distinctions in th
13 matches
Mail list logo
