On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 13:23:19 -0700 Albert Astals Cid
wrote
> El dilluns, 17 de setembre de 2018, a les 20:01:15 CEST, Andrew Crouthamel
> va escriure:
> Unless we can check if there has been no comment after the comment that
> changed the status to NEEDSINFO, it that's
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 13:23:19 -0700 Albert Astals Cid
wrote
> El dilluns, 17 de setembre de 2018, a les 20:01:15 CEST, Andrew Crouthamel
> va escriure:
> Unless we can check if there has been no comment after the comment that
> changed the status to NEEDSINFO, it that's
El dilluns, 17 de setembre de 2018, a les 20:01:15 CEST, Andrew Crouthamel va
escriure:
> I've been spending a lot of time browsing, searching, and filtering our bugs
> in Bugzilla. One of the areas I've found that could use improvement, are the
> NEEDSINFO bugs. Often, bugs are placed into
On 09/12/18 18:23, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:19 AM Nate Graham wrote:
>>
>> + kde-community for greater visibility
>
> Hi Nate,
>
> Just wondering why you forwarded this when I responded to A. on the
> same day he sent this?
http://foxkit.us/
My pronoun is
Thanks for taking the initiative on this, Andrew. I think everything you've
laid out makes sense, and I like those messages. +1.
Nate
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:56:09 -0700 Andrew Crouthamel
wrote
> Thanks Harald,
>
> I've spoken with buovjaga and x1sc0 regarding their
Thanks Harald,
I've spoken with buovjaga and x1sc0 regarding their LibreOffice QA procedures:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Gardening#Task:_Cleaning-out_NEEDINFO
Linked there are some scripts that are run either automated or manually. The
NEEDSINFO one is manual right now.
Based on memory, not actual policy:
On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 19:38:35 CEST Jos van den Oever wrote:
> What is the KDE policy on accepting code contributions under pseudonym? I've
> gotten review requests on Rust Qt Binding Generator under a pseudonym. Now
> I wonder if I can accept the
Hi all,
What is the KDE policy on accepting code contributions under pseudonym? I've
gotten review requests on Rust Qt Binding Generator under a pseudonym. Now I
wonder if I can accept the contribution. The contributor has, under pseudonym,
a KDE account.
Can one sign a Fiduciary License
On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 17:39:37 CEST Ilya Bizyaev wrote:
> Today the Russian-speaking KDE community proudly launches its updated
> website, KDE.ru.
Вот очен хорошо!
And so, having exhausted all the Russian I can produce at the drop-of-a-hat,
congratulations on having created a slick and
Ilmari Lauhakangas kirjoitti 18.9.2018 klo 14.13:
Harald Sitter kirjoitti 18.9.2018 klo 13.40:
Anywayyy... I can throw together some automation so long as someone
tells me what exactly the process should be :P
Wait a bit as I have just been in contact with Andrew about re-using the
Today the Russian-speaking KDE community proudly launches its updated website,
KDE.ru. The new website serves as the main page for the Russian-speaking
community. It provides localized information about KDE, product download links
and the list of social network pages we maintain. It is also
Harald Sitter ha scritto:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:59 PM Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
Would it also be possible to automatically remove the needinfo status if the
reporter adds a comment after it's set to needinfo?
Yes.
I know that this proposal was rejected in the past, but if the needinfo
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:59 PM Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>
> Would it also be possible to automatically remove the needinfo status if the
> reporter adds a comment after it's set to needinfo?
Yes.
Harald Sitter kirjoitti 18.9.2018 klo 13.40:
Anywayyy... I can throw together some automation so long as someone
tells me what exactly the process should be :P
Wait a bit as I have just been in contact with Andrew about re-using the
automation LibreOffice already has for this. I need to ask
> One of the areas I've found that could use improvement
IMHO it's really not a huge problem*.
If a reporter doesn't answer back, then they clearly don't care.
If its marked as needsinfo it's not in my lists, it doesn't affect me as a
dev in the slightest. They're filtered out by default, I have
Would it also be possible to automatically remove the needinfo status if the
reporter adds a comment after it's set to needinfo?
On dinsdag 18 september 2018 12:40:09 CEST Harald Sitter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 8:25 PM Nate Graham wrote:
> > +1, in favor, especially if we can close them
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 8:25 PM Nate Graham wrote:
> +1, in favor, especially if we can close them in an automated fashion.
> Closing bugs isn't as frustrating for filers as it used to be anyway, since
> if they ever show up again with new information, they can just re-open them.
Should be
On Sat, 11 Aug 2018 at 16:53, Valorie Zimmerman
wrote:
> * Case: conflict between Plasma release manager and Promo team in
> public (KDE Community list)
> Outcome: Open
This has now been resolved and the team has reverted back to it's
previous state as a community team where all can play a full
18 matches
Mail list logo
