Alexander Potashev ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Parts of https://invent.kde.org/websites/aether-sass/ are licensed
> under Apache License 2.0. This disagrees with the KDE licensing
> policy.
>
> Considering Apache-2.0 is similar to MIT, I don't see why it shouldn't
> be allowed by the policy. Is anyone
Le mercredi 15 septembre 2021 à 9:42 PM, Alexander Potashev
a écrit :
> Hi,
> Parts of https://invent.kde.org/websites/aether-sass/ are licensed
> under Apache License 2.0. This disagrees with the KDE licensing
> policy.
>
> Considering Apache-2.0 is similar to MIT, I don't see why it shouldn't
Hi,
Parts of https://invent.kde.org/websites/aether-sass/ are licensed
under Apache License 2.0. This disagrees with the KDE licensing
policy.
Considering Apache-2.0 is similar to MIT, I don't see why it shouldn't
be allowed by the policy. Is anyone aware of past discussions of the
KDE licensing
On Mittwoch, 15. September 2021 17:34:00 CEST Harald Sitter wrote:
> +1
+1 also from me! I think this license fits well into our approved license
landscape and should not make any issues regarding code/data portability
between the different KDE projects.
Cheers,
Andreas
On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 17:26:57 +0200
Volker Krause wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there's a MR [1] for ki18n containing data tables generated from OSM data,
> which implies the ODbL-1.0 license [2]. We also already have other places
> ([3], [4]) actually doing this.
>
> However that's a license not yet
+1
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 5:27 PM Volker Krause wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> there's a MR [1] for ki18n containing data tables generated from OSM data,
> which implies the ODbL-1.0 license [2]. We also already have other places
> ([3], [4]) actually doing this.
>
> However that's a license not yet
Hi,
there's a MR [1] for ki18n containing data tables generated from OSM data,
which implies the ODbL-1.0 license [2]. We also already have other places
([3], [4]) actually doing this.
However that's a license not yet covered by our license policy, so I suggest
we add it.
ODbL is essentially
