Mailing list unsubscription incident

2024-04-20 Thread Ben Cooksley
Hi all, It has been brought to Sysadmin's attention that a number of subscribers to the konsole-devel mailing list were automatically unsubscribed from the list in the past few days. This was an action taken correctly by the system, albeit in error due to a number of badly formed emails that

Please cleanup old forks

2024-04-20 Thread Ben Cooksley
Hi all, As part of routine maintenance on Invent (Gitlab) i've been reviewing the total amount of space currently being consumed by repositories. At this time, the top 100 largest repositories on Invent (we have 14,000 or so for context) are consuming around 21% of the total space. It would

Re: Proposal unify back our release schedules

2024-04-20 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 1:51 AM Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, > > On Saturday 20 April 2024 15:12:48 CEST Ingo Klöcker wrote: > > On Freitag, 19. April 2024 22:40:38 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 4:39 AM Kevin Ottens wrote: > > > > The example you give shows Plasma

Re: Proposal unify back our release schedules

2024-04-20 Thread Valorie Zimmerman
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 9:39 AM Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, > > ::most history snipped:: > > And then have a single big marketing > announcement for a Plasma x.y.2 per year with its own marketing name. > > ::snip:: > > > * Only have one release announcement on our website. We can call

Re: Proposal unify back our release schedules

2024-04-20 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Freitag, 19. April 2024 22:51:55 CEST Jakob Petsovits wrote: ... > all KF dependencies from source. Now that all the megarelease is out, we > might want to consider relying on distro packages for KF6 by default, in > the same way that Qt is not built by default either. This would underscore >

Re: Proposal unify back our release schedules

2024-04-20 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Saturday 20 April 2024 15:12:48 CEST Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Freitag, 19. April 2024 22:40:38 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 4:39 AM Kevin Ottens wrote: > > > The example you give shows Plasma depending on Gear, this shouldn't > > > happen, so > > > I'd argue:

Re: Proposal unify back our release schedules

2024-04-20 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Freitag, 19. April 2024 22:40:38 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 4:39 AM Kevin Ottens wrote: > > The example you give shows Plasma depending on Gear, this shouldn't > > happen, so > > I'd argue: let's fix that instead. In my opinion the same goes for Gear depending on

Re: Proposal unify back our release schedules

2024-04-20 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Freitag, 19. April 2024 14:26:45 CEST Sune Vuorela wrote: > It might make sense for plasma and gear to follow the same schedule. But > I really like what we have going with frameworks. > > One issue that leads to the 'frameworks stable, release monthly' was > that sometimes, even often, you

Re: Proposal unify back our release schedules

2024-04-20 Thread Björn Strömberg
i know quite a few have responded to this, but as the big warning on this, the fact that the three parts cant be released independently, is a big warning flag that a overhaul is needed of the overlapping architecture. i know this is a big issue, and the bigger the project, the bigger the

Re: Proposal unify back our release schedules

2024-04-20 Thread Jakob Petsovits
Others have made convincing arguments for not tying the projects together from an engineering point of view, which I find easy to agree with. I also like the current monthly KF schedule in that it allows me to submit MRs early on in a Plasma development cycle and use them in Plasma shortly

Re: Proposal unify back our release schedules

2024-04-20 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:35 AM Volker Krause wrote: > > On Freitag, 19. April 2024 11:04:33 CEST Carl Schwan wrote: > > * We currently don't have a stable branch for Framework and it takes often > > up to one month for fixes to be deployed. The Framework releases is also > > not in sync with