Re: [kde-community] "Fork Me" button within the kde git infrastructure?

2015-09-21 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 21 September 2015 at 02:30, David Narvaez wrote: > On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> I see you're not used to the diverse term on github-alike sites: >> forking is more like creating a feature branch. The repo is separate

Re: [kde-community] "Fork Me" button within the kde git infrastructure?

2015-09-20 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 21 September 2015 at 01:27, Michael Pyne wrote: > On Mon, September 21, 2015 00:05:33 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> PS: Freedom of forking - derivative works is not so terrible, it's a >> pilliar of FOSS. > > Last time I tried it, running git-clone against our KDE git

Re: [kde-community] "Fork Me" button within the kde git infrastructure?

2015-09-20 Thread David Narvaez
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > This is about r-w git repo for KDE and non-KDE devs. > In git times the need is easier to understand for someone who > interacts with 3rd party projects at code level. > > What is your workflow in this case? > Do you send

Re: [kde-community] "Fork Me" button within the kde git infrastructure?

2015-09-20 Thread Michael Pyne
On Mon, September 21, 2015 00:05:33 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > PS: Freedom of forking - derivative works is not so terrible, it's a > pilliar of FOSS. Last time I tried it, running git-clone against our KDE git infrastructure still worked just fine, and thus forking is quite easy to do. Did this

Re: [kde-community] "Fork Me" button within the kde git infrastructure?

2015-09-20 Thread David Narvaez
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > I see you're not used to the diverse term on github-alike sites: > forking is more like creating a feature branch. The repo is separate > but changes can be merged back (how it's a matter of tool set). It is just like

Re: [kde-community] "Fork Me" button within the kde git infrastructure?

2015-09-20 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 20 September 2015 at 23:55, David Narvaez wrote: > On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> Hi >> I'd like to ask if this can be technically feasible and something we want: > > > > The subject sounds to me like a terrible idea,