To summarise and expand upon my thoughts on this given the feedback from a
couple of you:
Essentially I feel we should be concentrating on the promoting the
versatility of KDE ecosphere, and what that means to you as the user.
That's really what I was driving at when I was asking the question
Hi David,
My comments below are slightly tangential to the 'vision' discussion
(which is bigger and something I haven't properly thought through for
myself, yet). However, here are some thoughts on one of your points,
which is also important in the discussion of a vision (you wouldn't have
On Tuesday 23 September 2014 16:06:36 Stuart Jarvis wrote:
What’s making this more
confusing is that the VDG are now discussing branding some apps along
the lines of ‘Made for…’
I'd be very concerned about this, for any but the most basic components
deeply entwined in the desktop shell
Thanks for clarifying Thomas. I am too busy to reply in full now and I've
realised now that I what I said could be misinterpreted. Hope I didn't
upset anyone!
Kind regards,
David
On 23 Sep 2014 17:44, Thomas Pfeiffer thomas.pfeif...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 23 September 2014 16:06:36 Stuart
On Tuesday 23 September 2014 18:44:07 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
On Tuesday 23 September 2014 16:06:36 Stuart Jarvis wrote:
What’s making this more
confusing is that the VDG are now discussing branding some apps along
the lines of ‘Made for…’
I'd be very concerned about this, for any
On 2014-09-20 23:05, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Saturday, September 20, 2014 22.44:45 David Wright wrote:
*By KDE here im referring to the software, as I'm not sure what the
term is
for the amalgamation of plasma 5 / kf5 applications
There is no such amalgamation, and that's probably why
Thanks for this Andrew!
KDE offers the Great Technology and a brand indeed. Below in my looong
2c for the vision topic, written with the widest possible user base in
mind, some devil's advocate approach, assuming that we are developing
for users, for self-development, and for fun, in no universal
Hello again, I was going to reply to each response individually but I
thought it might be simpler to do one reply.
First off, thanks for being so so gracious in reviewing the thoughts I
shared. As I mentioned these were personal thoughts prompted by my
experience at Akademy this year. There's
On Friday 19 September 2014 19:04:53 Valorie Zimmerman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Andrew Lake jamboar...@gmail.com wrote:
Image: http://wstaw.org/m/2014/09/19/A_possible_vision.png
I would say Plasma and Frameworks at the center.
I think it's right to put the KDE
On Friday 19 September 2014 19:04:53 Valorie Zimmerman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Andrew Lake jamboar...@gmail.com wrote:
Image: http://wstaw.org/m/2014/09/19/A_possible_vision.png
I would say Plasma and Frameworks at the center.
I think it's right to put the KDE desktop in
On Saturday, September 20, 2014 10.15:56 Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
On Friday 19 September 2014 19:04:53 Valorie Zimmerman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Andrew Lake jamboar...@gmail.com wrote:
Image: http://wstaw.org/m/2014/09/19/A_possible_vision.png
I would say Plasma and
I wonder whether going forward we would be better served by asking the
question of our users, 'What do you need KDE* to be for you?'
Because essentially we are saying that with plasma 5 and kf5 it could be
anything you want it to be.
Maybe we should start by splitting this into commercial and
On Friday, September 19, 2014 09.56:39 Andrew Lake wrote:
* Be free
* Maintain our purpose
* Have fun
If I am understanding your proposal (and perhaps I'm not .. if so, please
offer clarification), the vision statement consisting of the above three
elements is a stand our ground vision in
On Saturday, September 20, 2014 22.44:45 David Wright wrote:
I wonder whether going forward we would be better served by asking the
question of our users, 'What do you need KDE* to be for you?'
The users KDE has now?
The users KDE wants?
The users KDE has contact with?
Because essentially we
Hi,
I wanted to share a few thoughts in case it might be helpful right now. I
apologize now for the length. Not that he necessary endorses any of this,
but Thomas Pfeiffer was gracious enough to provide many of the examples of
what we're already doing. A pdf that's a bit more readable is here:
15 matches
Mail list logo
