On Thursday 20 February 2014 09:27:05 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
In searching of a business model...
I understand that in case of GCompris content is king. Since it's
getting rewritten (minus the resources), at least scripts can be
published under any license suits the author, if you ask me, for
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 21:18:25 Thomas Zander wrote:
The beliefs of freedom are not at all hurt by someone taking that FLOSS and
packaging it for a fee. There is no incompatibility there.
Agreed, and this could be an opportunity to explore what is possible there.
Perhaps the way we’ve
Le 19/02/2014 21:24, David Edmundson a écrit :
What I see as a problem is that this has an implicit attached request
to our current KDE Windows releasing team saying they shouldn't
package and release GCompris.
It would be unfair on Bruno for our KDE Windows team to do so. Legally
they
Le 20/02/2014 09:37, Martin Gräßlin a écrit :
On Thursday 20 February 2014 09:03:04 Bruno Coudoin wrote:
Le 19/02/2014 21:24, David Edmundson a écrit :
What I see as a problem is that this has an implicit attached request
to our current KDE Windows releasing team saying they shouldn't
package
Hi Bruno,
I am Agustín Benito Bethencourt, KDE e.V. Treasurer.
It is important to mention that the Windows and MacOSX version are
distributed as demo ware. These binaries have only a limited number of
activities and the users are invited to buy an activation code through
paypal. The
Hi Bruno,
I am Agustin Benito, KDE eV Treasurer.
Thanks for providing us the information around the income that GConpris
generates. We do not have a clear policy about this topic. I do not see a
major problem in this area.
We have a wide variety of different business models used by KDE
On 2014-02-19, Agustin benito bethencourt aben...@kde.org wrote:
I must confess though that I am worry about the association between:
* proprietary platforms = commercial
* free platforms = non commercial
that might be implied from this model.
I understood it that it was 'source code is free
There were (and probably still are) KDE apps available in the N9 app
store for a fee. So, it's not new, and I don't see any problem with
it.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote:
On 2014-02-19, Agustin benito bethencourt aben...@kde.org wrote:
I must confess
On Wednesday 19. February 2014 12.58.57 Agustin benito bethencourt wrote:
I must confess though that I am worry about the association between:
* proprietary platforms = commercial
* free platforms = non commercial
that might be implied from this model.
But the business models is a
Le 19/02/2014 13:43, Agustin a écrit :
Hi Bruno,
I am Agustin Benito, KDE eV Treasurer.
Thanks for providing us the information around the income that GConpris
generates. We do not have a clear policy about this topic. I do not see a
major problem in this area.
Hi, I have no problem sharing
On Wednesday 19. February 2014 21.24.22 David Edmundson wrote:
The open source as well as the free-software movements are about freedom,
and I believe KDE supports that as well.
The beliefs of freedom are not at all hurt by someone taking that FLOSS
and
packaging it for a fee. There is
Hello,
On Thursday 13 February 2014 04:48:00 Bruno Coudoin wrote:
[...]
So this is a brain new project with just a demonstrator of only 4
activities on 140. I think it is a good time frame for GCompris to join
the Kde community for different reasons: [...]
I hope my request did raise your
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
decides to go for GPLv3+, and then leaves the project, it is possible
that a rewrite would need to happen for the new people getting
involved to avoid the limitation of GPLv3 which is not present in
GPLv2. This would impose
On Saturday, February 15, 2014 00:03:15 Bruno Coudoin wrote:
Le 14/02/2014 14:12, Inge Wallin a écrit :
On Friday, February 14, 2014 00:28:38 Bruno Coudoin wrote:
Le 13/02/2014 23:17, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 22:54:12 Bruno Coudoin wrote:
Anyway another
On Friday, 2014-02-14, 13:02:31, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Hi Aaron,
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:17:05 +0100
Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
On Friday, February 14, 2014 04:24:12 Shlomi Fish wrote:
The VideoLAN / VLC project took the opposite approach and after being
unhappy with the
On Friday, February 14, 2014 00:28:38 Bruno Coudoin wrote:
Le 13/02/2014 23:17, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 22:54:12 Bruno Coudoin wrote:
Anyway another approach is needed here for the new version.
Knights, a chess program written with KDE libraries, has an
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:28:08PM +0100, ivan.cu...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for adding gpl3 to the licensing policy
Please review the proposals I have made and posted in the thread licence
policy updates
Jonathan
___
kde-community mailing list
Le 13/02/2014 22:15, Albert Astals Cid a écrit :
Wait, does GCompris require for copyright assignment to the FSF?
No it does not. I know that it is a FSF recommendation but we never
followed it.
In GCompris all the copyright are assigned to their authors.
Bruno.
18 matches
Mail list logo
