On Wednesday 23 July 2014 23:15:42 Eike Hein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we get to welcome QtCurve to KDE today. \o/
>
> The migration is done, the code now resides in kde:qtcurve
> and Bugzilla and ReviewBoard have been set up as well.
welcome and thanks Eike for helping on getting this important piece of
El Dimecres, 23 de juliol de 2014, a les 23:15:42, Eike Hein va escriure:
> Hi,
>
> we get to welcome QtCurve to KDE today. \o/
Welcome :)
Cheers,
Albert
>
> The migration is done, the code now resides in kde:qtcurve
> and Bugzilla and ReviewBoard have been set up as well.
>
> The KDE i18n
Hi,
we get to welcome QtCurve to KDE today. \o/
The migration is done, the code now resides in kde:qtcurve
and Bugzilla and ReviewBoard have been set up as well.
The KDE i18n crew is currently working on integrating the
existing translations into their infra and letting scripty
loose on them.
Heya,
I've been talking with Yichao Yu and we're going to resume this
process.
Right now the immediate steps are:
- Getting him a KDE developer account.
- Contacting sysadmin to set up repo/bko/rb (playground for now).
- Working out a transition plan for !git features used on GitHub.
Basically
On Monday 20 January 2014, Yichao Yu wrote:
> I would like to move QtCurve to the KDE infrastructure for several
> reasons. Besides the most obvious ones like making use of the repo,
> wiki, bug trackers etc. :
> - As a KDE friendly cross toolkit style engine, this will help me and
> future QtCurve
El Dilluns, 27 de gener de 2014, a les 20:14:57, Albert Astals Cid va
escriure:
> El Dilluns, 27 de gener de 2014, a les 14:10:36, Yichao Yu va escriure:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > El Dilluns, 27 de gener de 2014, a les 09:54:01, Yichao Yu va escriure:
> >
El Dilluns, 27 de gener de 2014, a les 14:10:36, Yichao Yu va escriure:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Dilluns, 27 de gener de 2014, a les 09:54:01, Yichao Yu va escriure:
> >> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:29 AM, David Edmundson
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> > In short w
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dilluns, 27 de gener de 2014, a les 09:54:01, Yichao Yu va escriure:
>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:29 AM, David Edmundson
>>
>> wrote:
>> > In short we leave this thread for a few days for anyone else to make
>> > positive or negative
El Dilluns, 27 de gener de 2014, a les 11:46:23, Yichao Yu va escriure:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Yuri Chornoivan wrote:
> > написане Mon, 27 Jan 2014 17:55:20 +0200, Yichao Yu :
> >> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Yuri Chornoivan
> >>
> >>> Just want to notice that QtCurve has well-
El Dilluns, 27 de gener de 2014, a les 18:21:58, Yuri Chornoivan va escriure:
> написане Mon, 27 Jan 2014 17:55:20 +0200, Yichao Yu :
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Yuri Chornoivan
> >
> >> Just want to notice that QtCurve has well-established translation
> >> infrastructure unlike some rec
El Dilluns, 27 de gener de 2014, a les 10:55:20, Yichao Yu va escriure:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Yuri Chornoivan
>
> > Just want to notice that QtCurve has well-established translation
> > infrastructure unlike some recent approved KDE projects. It would be great
> > to have it with rea
El Dilluns, 27 de gener de 2014, a les 09:54:01, Yichao Yu va escriure:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:29 AM, David Edmundson
>
> wrote:
> > In short we leave this thread for a few days for anyone else to make
> > positive or negative comments about the software entering KDE. Then if
> > everyone ap
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Yuri Chornoivan wrote:
> написане Mon, 27 Jan 2014 17:55:20 +0200, Yichao Yu :
>
>
>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Yuri Chornoivan
>>>
>>> Just want to notice that QtCurve has well-established translation
>>> infrastructure unlike some recent approved KDE pro
написане Mon, 27 Jan 2014 17:55:20 +0200, Yichao Yu :
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Yuri Chornoivan
Just want to notice that QtCurve has well-established translation
infrastructure unlike some recent approved KDE projects. It would be
great to
have it with ready-to-release translations i
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Yuri Chornoivan
> Just want to notice that QtCurve has well-established translation
> infrastructure unlike some recent approved KDE projects. It would be great to
> have it with ready-to-release translations in KDE catalogs. :)
As for translation, I actually have
понеділок, 27-січ-2014 09:54:01 Yichao Yu написано:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:29 AM, David Edmundson
>
> wrote:
> > In short we leave this thread for a few days for anyone else to make
> > positive or negative comments about the software entering KDE. Then if
> > everyone approves we merge your
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:29 AM, David Edmundson
wrote:
>
> In short we leave this thread for a few days for anyone else to make
> positive or negative comments about the software entering KDE. Then if
> everyone approves we merge your code into our repos. It then goes
> through a mandatory 2 week
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Yichao Yu wrote:
>> Sorry but I'm a little bit confused.
>> According to what I have heard before, supports from the sysadmin and
>> other teams are necessary anyway if a project want to join the KDE
>> comm
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Yichao Yu wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
>>
>> That *and* the incubator is also meant for projects having a "not yet part of
>> KDE" team joining. For instance if VLC would ever want to join (random
>
> Not sure how VLC ppl feel but
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
>
> That *and* the incubator is also meant for projects having a "not yet part of
> KDE" team joining. For instance if VLC would ever want to join (random
Not sure how VLC ppl feel but I am happy to see that happen. =)
> example) it would go t
On Monday 20 January 2014 23:44:01 Eike Hein wrote:
> On Monday 20 January 2014 17:13:47 Yichao Yu wrote:
> > QtCurve (although being not very polished) is already stable and have
> > made several releases that are packaged by a number of distributions.
> > Is there anything I am missing here?
>
>
On Monday 20 January 2014 17:13:47 Yichao Yu wrote:
> QtCurve (although being not very polished) is already stable and have
> made several releases that are packaged by a number of distributions.
> Is there anything I am missing here?
I think Kevin just wanted to point out there's an additional
wi
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Note there's the incubator now for existing projects willing to join:
> http://community.kde.org/Incubator
>
I have seen the email of the restarted Incubator project before but I
thought it was mainly for start up projects?
QtCurv
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Martin Sandsmark
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 08:53:34AM -0500, Yichao Yu wrote:
>> I would like to move QtCurve to the KDE infrastructure
>
> Yes! :-D
>
> I've been using QtCurve for a while now, and I'd even argue for replacing
> Oxygen with it for KDE Plasm
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 08:53:34AM -0500, Yichao Yu wrote:
> I would like to move QtCurve to the KDE infrastructure
Yes! :-D
I've been using QtCurve for a while now, and I'd even argue for replacing
Oxygen with it for KDE Plasma Desktop Framework Visual Team Studio 5 SC
Edition 2014.1, with the r
Hello,
On Monday 20 January 2014 15:29:00 David Edmundson wrote:
> Brilliant.
>
> So the next page to read is
> http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle. It explains
> the entrance process and the SC vs extragear.
Note there's the incubator now for existing projects willing to join
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:29 AM, David Edmundson
wrote:
> Brilliant.
>
> So the next page to read is
> http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle. It explains
> the entrance process and the SC vs extragear.
>
Yes, I've also read that and thank you for your explaination.
I believe QtCu
Brilliant.
So the next page to read is
http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle. It explains
the entrance process and the SC vs extragear.
In short we leave this thread for a few days for anyone else to make
positive or negative comments about the software entering KDE. Then if
ever
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:11 AM, David Edmundson
wrote:
> I think this makes a lot sense and I would welcome QtCurve into KDE.
Thank you for your support.
>
> Can you read though http://manifesto.kde.org/ and confirm you would
> agree to all the commitments
> (http://manifesto.kde.org/commitment
I think this makes a lot sense and I would welcome QtCurve into KDE.
Can you read though http://manifesto.kde.org/ and confirm you would
agree to all the commitments
(http://manifesto.kde.org/commitments.html) of a KDE project.
David
___
kde-community m
Hi,
My name is Yichao Yu (yuyichao). I started to use KDE as my main DE
about one and two years ago and started contributing to some KDE
projects soon after including konsole, kdelibs, dolphin etc..
I have recently (about half a year ago) adopted QtCurve[1], a highly
configurable theme engine for
31 matches
Mail list logo
