It's time for a new updates to the KDE Licensing Policy
The purpose of the policy is to ensure a common understanding of what
KDE code and contributions can be licenced as for copying. It should
allow maximum reusability amongst KDE and other free software groups
while ensuring people are
Hi folks, I have no announcements, but was thinking about our Season
of KDE and how we can enlarge and improve it. I believe we've been
thinking of it too much like GSoC, when it can be so much more.
For instance, I've seen a few announcements from maintainers wanting
to step back from a large
Hi everyone,
I recently realized that unless you ask fellow KDE contributors personally where
they live, you don't really know where over the world (or even in your home
country) KDE is spread.
I think this is a pity, given that knowing that would allow us to, among other
things
- show the
On dinsdag 20 september 2016 11:49:43 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> Gnome already do this
> https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeWorldWide
>
> and I have vauge memories of KDE doing it in the past too, or maybe I dreamt
> that
You didn't dream that: https://dot.kde.org/2002/03/16/kde-worldwide-goes-live
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 13:42:35 CEST Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I recently realized that unless you ask fellow KDE contributors personally
> where they live, you don't really know where over the world (or even in
> your home country) KDE is spread.
>
> [...]
>
> So, two
Am Dienstag, 20. September 2016, 11:49:43 CEST schrieb Jonathan Riddell:
> Gnome already do this
> https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeWorldWide
>
> and I have vauge memories of KDE doing it in the past too, or maybe I dreamt
> that
>
Gnome already do this
https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeWorldWide
and I have vauge memories of KDE doing it in the past too, or maybe I dreamt
that
Jonathan
On 20.09.2016 13:49, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
Gnome already do this
https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeWorldWide
Nice!
Though a zoomable map would be nicer, because on that map it's a bit difficult
to distinguish cities in more crowded countries.
I also remembered it, but I didn't remember the location of the map. It's
even in the internet archive: https://web.archive.
org/web/20020402050748/http://worldwide.kde.org/map/
2016-09-20 14:11 GMT+02:00 Sebastian Kügler :
> On dinsdag 20 september 2016 11:49:43 CEST Jonathan
On 2016-09-20, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> Differences:
> Removed
> "code may not be copied from Qt into KDE Platform as Qt is LGPL 2.1"
> Rationale: Qt is now LGPL 3 as well as 2
Qt is not LGPL2.1 in general. As long as we want to be LGPL2.1 compat,
we can't copy code from Qt.
On 20 September 2016 at 22:54, Thomas Pfeiffer
wrote:
> Certainly not. AGPL is like GPL in that sense, with the extra rule
>> that you must publish the source code even if you're only giving
>> access over the network and not distributing binaries.
>>
>>
Certainly not. AGPL is like GPL in that sense, with the extra rule
that you must publish the source code even if you're only giving
access over the network and not distributing binaries.
I don't think an AGPL library makes much sense though.
ALGPL makes sense then :)
On
On 20 September 2016 at 20:42, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2016-09-20, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> > Differences:
> > Removed
> > "code may not be copied from Qt into KDE Platform as Qt is LGPL 2.1"
> > Rationale: Qt is now LGPL 3 as well as 2
>
> Qt is not
On 20.09.2016 19:52, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
2016-09-20 14:04 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Riddell :
Added:
''Applications which are intended to be run on a server'' can be
licenced under the GNU AGPL 3.0 or later
Rationale: KDE Store code is under AGPL
Question: should this be an
On 20 September 2016 at 22:00, Nicolás Alvarez
wrote:
> 2016-09-20 16:53 GMT-03:00 Jaroslaw Staniek :
> >
> >
> > On 20 September 2016 at 21:42, Nicolás Alvarez <
> nicolas.alva...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> 2016-09-20 16:30 GMT-03:00 Jaroslaw
2016-09-20 16:30 GMT-03:00 Jaroslaw Staniek :
>
>
> On 20 September 2016 at 21:19, Thomas Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>>
>> On 20.09.2016 19:52, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
>>>
>>> 2016-09-20 14:04 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Riddell :
Added:
2016-09-20 16:53 GMT-03:00 Jaroslaw Staniek :
>
>
> On 20 September 2016 at 21:42, Nicolás Alvarez
> wrote:
>>
>> 2016-09-20 16:30 GMT-03:00 Jaroslaw Staniek :
>> >
>> >
>> > On 20 September 2016 at 21:19, Thomas Pfeiffer
On 20 September 2016 at 21:19, Thomas Pfeiffer
wrote:
> On 20.09.2016 19:52, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
>
>> 2016-09-20 14:04 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Riddell :
>>
>>> Added:
>>> ''Applications which are intended to be run on a server'' can be
>>> licenced under
18 matches
Mail list logo