On 2013-11-11, Thomas Zander zan...@kde.org wrote:
Could you please explain to those that don't immediately spot it how the
before and after are functionally different?
That it opens up for several groups of contributors, KDE contributors and
other people. I do also think that it is important
On 2014-01-15, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
tarball? An XML file somewhere? Personally I find distros should be smart
enough to decide which apps they want to ship by default and which not.
I've actually in my distribution tried to ship stuff, including package
selection, quite close
On 2014-02-19, Agustin benito bethencourt aben...@kde.org wrote:
I must confess though that I am worry about the association between:
* proprietary platforms = commercial
* free platforms = non commercial
that might be implied from this model.
I understood it that it was 'source code is free
On 2014-06-18, Patrick Spendrin patrick_spend...@gmx.de wrote:
I looked at Deutsche Bahn and there is a direct train from Berlin to
Brno on the 4th (thursday, remember on friday is e.V. GA)
starting at 12:46
Dresden at 15:06
arrival at 20:19
cost 41,60 EUR p.P.
I might somehow also join
On 2014-09-02, Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote:
Hi all,
A number of our mailing lists appear to be being insufficiently moderated.
Can we please have volunteers for moderating these lists, or
indications that they can be closed?
@Board: Please moderate your queue more regularly.
On 2015-04-06, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
Hi, these lists have private archives
* https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-bugs-dist
* https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
* https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-announce
*
On Friday 26 June 2015 09:18:01 Peter Bouda wrote:
On the other end of the simple-complex scale I suggest to create an
Embedded Linux system that boots a QML count down app. I did a similar
project recently, with touchscreen and WIFI, so it would be a matter of
writing the QML code. I have a
Qt World summit is approaching, and it is likely going to be amazing:
http://www.qtworldsummit.com/ - 5th - 7th October 2015
KDE will be there, with a booth and gaining knowledge and helping the
conference a bit.
We have quite a bit of tickets, so now we just need people. Are you one of
them?
On 2015-08-30, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org wrote:
Which aspects of KGpg are nicer to use? Could those same changes come
to Kleopatra possibly? or is this another Parley vs KWordquiz and we
should do our best to keep both around?
The key list and coloring is .. nicer.
And Kleopatra tries
On 2015-09-20, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> But effectively it won't be reviews because the KDE reviewers won't use it.
> Or do you think we need some dracon law because our community cannot do
> self-control?
I have just been fooled once regarding github and KDE. That makes me not
On 2015-09-20, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> First, I have no idea where this "use github for review" comes from at =
> all.
> Who wants to do that in the first place?
The github pull requests comes automatically with review abilities, so
once it is there and one already interacts with
On 2015-09-19, Kevin Krammer wrote:
>> No, I'm afraid of code review slowly moving from KDE to github up to =
> the
>> final point where I need to get a github account because otherwise I =
> cannot
>> contribute code.
>
> You mean that a KDE project would ignore your review
On 2015-09-20, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
> How exactly have you been fooled?
> Proposal #1 - accepted,
Proposal #1 was a pure mirror. No other services used. Before the
initial mirror was actually completed, the next proposal comes up to
start doing even more github.
>
On 2015-09-20, Emil Sedgh wrote:
> What if we create a bot that makes a review request on our internal tool
> (Phab/Reviewboard) for each Github Pull request and tries to make a
> bridge between KDE's infrastructure and Github?
>
> A bot that would sync the
On 2015-09-20, Martin Klapetek wrote:
> Gnome in their years history of github mirroring had 4 pull requests
> (it was mentioned in the other thread...one of the others).
>
> So we might very likely be talking non-issues here anyway.
Gnome is actively advicing against
On 2015-09-19, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>
> Sounds like a bit superficial premature complain. If only we had a flood of
> pull requests...
It is not premature to complain!
I personally feel a bit fucked over right now. All this started with a
KDE github mirror and *just a
On 2015-09-19, Martin Klapetek wrote:
> To further expand on the idea, the workflow would be as follows:
>
> * bot looks through our repos
> * bot finds a pull request
> * bot downloads the diff between requested branch and mirror HEAD
> * bot uploads it to phabricator
On 2015-09-18, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Don't we slowly drop support for Reviewboard?
> (even I am still not sure how to correctly update phabricator diff
> from command line)
Then notes should be changed when we move from reviewboard to
> 2. Regarding the issues/pull
On 2016-03-15, David Jarvie wrote:
>>> > "A world in which everyone enjoys freedom and privacy and has
>>control
>>> > over their digital life."
>
> "A world in which everyone has control over their digital life and enjoys
> freedom and privacy."
I've not been able to follow
On 2016-07-09, sabayon11 wrote:
> Does it mean that I will be able to install Dolphin as stand-alone
> application on other graphic environments like Xfce, Cinammon, i.e.
> without all Plasma dependences like kde-runtime, etc.?
kde-runtime was not a plasma dependency, but an
On 2016-09-20, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> Differences:
> Removed
> "code may not be copied from Qt into KDE Platform as Qt is LGPL 2.1"
> Rationale: Qt is now LGPL 3 as well as 2
Qt is not LGPL2.1 in general. As long as we want to be LGPL2.1 compat,
we can't copy code from Qt.
On 2017-08-08, Eike Hein wrote:
> Berlin, Germany will once again host a Qt World Summit this year, on
> October 10th through 12th. This follows on from the Qt Contributor
> Summit on October 9th and 10th.
>
> I've stepped up to coordinate KDE's presence at QtWS this year. Sune,
>
On 2018-02-19, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> I think it would be a good idea. Also, I don't really see why someone looking
> for a good Qt developer wouldn't make a beeline for our community :-)
>
I have in the past approached several companies trying to get them to
support KDE
On 2018-08-19, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> Interestingly, in almost all conversations I had at Akademy about this topic,
> people were actually very positive about the prospect of growing an ecosystem
> of companies around KDE. Maybe it's the difference between the people who are
> still active
On 2018-08-22, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> There's a lot more material about FOSDEM booths than is initially apparent.
> There have been threads on various lists about merchandise, too: basically it
> comes down to "print or order stuff locally, get it reimbursed". Just this
> week at Akademy i
On 2018-08-24, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> This was a quite complex situation, there were many factors involved. But
> again the negative feedback was not about the question if it's ok to pay
> developers but about other aspects of how the project was handled.
And on some of those questions,
On 2018-09-04, Eike Hein wrote:
> In the debrief, I think we were quite happy with how things went and
> concluded if we get another chance, we'd try to do it again. The Qt
> Company feels the same way, as they've reached out and offered similar
> accomodations for this year as well.
I think we
On 2018-09-29, Valorie Zimmerman wrote:
>> discuss on the appropriateness of REOPENED.
>> I'd rather find an alternative for REPORTED, if this confusion is going to
>>
>
> OPENED ?
RECIEVED ?
though opened might be better.
/Sune
On 2019-01-10, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> It would be nice if the list of people were complete-ish, so we (as a
> community) know who to look out for and look forward to. If you're available
> to help at the booth, please say so as well. Jonathan is coordinating things,
I'll probably be there,
On 2019-01-27, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
>
>> On 27 Jan 2019, at 15:04, Krešimir Čohar wrote:
>>
>> This email puts forth for your consideration a proposal to change our
>> current licensing policy to accommodate three more licenses that cover the
>> new photographic selection of wallpapers in
On 2019-01-29, Krešimir Čohar wrote:
> I wouldn't necessarily characterize the Unsplash license as FOSS, but
> rather public domain with restrictions (not entirely public domain). I also
I think this is a problem. Both "not characterize as FOSS", and "with
restrictions". And basically the core
On 2019-04-12, Eike Hein wrote:
> Pseudonyms don't jive with that for me. Someone not entrusting me with
> their real name feels regressive vs. our current community standards.
> It's a bit uncomfortable.
I have kind of the same feeling. Though real name doesn't have to be
legal name.
But
On 2019-11-04, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> Over the last months, I requested the "severity" (importance) of several
> tickets to be adjusted:
I'm not sure if you have grown up over time, but I kind of sense the
same attitude from you as back when you were banned from debian bts, as
one of the
On 2020-09-08, Andreas Cord-Landwehr wrote:
> **LGPL 3.0**
> For you as a developer
> ... and in return
> - you have to provide explenation how to update the library
In general, I kind of like it. Though this isn't said "strong" enough.
Adding "and must make it technically possible to do so".
On 2021-05-26, Anna “CyberTailor” wrote:
>> After 36 months, the code becomes Apache-2.0 licensed (the conversion period)
>
> So you can use old sentry versions, which are open source.
>
+1. I think we should support free and open source software.
/Sune
On 2021-03-24, Valorie Zimmerman wrote:
> Thanks, Carl. I would like to point out that Carl posted his suggestion to
> the individual people on this list. He did not propose that the KDE e.V.
> officially take a stand.
Then I'd like to propose that KDE signs it.
/Sune
On 2021-03-24, Jos van den Oever wrote:
> The GitHub organization that initiated the letter is anonymous:
>https://github.com/rms-open-letter
It might be anonymous in the organization, but the people behind it is
our friends at OSI, our friends in Gnome and our friends in Debian and
some
On 2023-10-02, Joseph P. De Veaugh-Geiss wrote:
> In this context, a radical idea came up: perhaps we can archive and
> retire the Dot altogether.
I'd like to come up with an alternative proposal:
Make the dot more used:
- Make it easier to submit articles there
- Retire all project blogs in
On 2022-10-23, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> (such as a Yubikey) or TOTP (using the app of choice on your phone)
There seems to be some questions about what possible "app of choice" is
available.
kde has keysmith
f-droid have freeotp+
sailfish has sailotp somewhere
In the less privacy oriented
On 2023-04-30, Joseph P. De Veaugh-Geiss wrote:
[Low traffic lists with relevant subscribers]
> In my opinion moving discussions to more active channels like Matrix or
> Discuss may increase visibility of the topics discussed and encourage
> participation from the larger community. Such
On 2023-08-02, Harald Sitter wrote:
> I don't think so
As such, I have a hard time seeing that these mentioned features is
important enough to give in on what I feel are our principles of a
organization doing free software.
I have a hard time finding any featureset where it would be important
On 2023-08-02, Harald Sitter wrote:
> Ahoy!
>
> How about we start using the gitlab ultimate rather than the free version?
Is it free software ?
https://mako.cc/writing/hill-free_tools.html
/Sune
On 2023-06-21, Harald Sitter wrote:
> may be of interest
> https://discuss.kde.org/t/post-planet-kde-org-blogs-on-discuss-automatically/2287/1
I kind of want comments to my blog post as comments on my blog post, not
in all sorts of other forums.
/Sune
43 matches
Mail list logo