Thanks!
On zondag 28 oktober 2018 06:02:13 CET Andrew Crouthamel wrote:
> FYI boud, I finally got around to making the changes we agreed to a few
> weeks ago: https://phabricator.kde.org/D16474
>
> Hopefully that helps.
>
>
> Andrew Crouthamel
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On
FYI boud, I finally got around to making the changes we agreed to a few weeks
ago: https://phabricator.kde.org/D16474
Hopefully that helps.
Andrew Crouthamel
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 4:49 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On maandag 8 oktober 2018 21:10:44
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:01 AM Nate Graham wrote:
>
> From the perspective of someone who triages non-Krita bugs, I would say that
> the template has been a big success. My observations (again, for non-Krita
> bugs) are as follows:
>
> 1. Technically adept users are now filing better bugs,
On dinsdag 23 oktober 2018 23:01:21 CEST Nate Graham wrote:
> I understand that this has not been the experience for Krita's bug triagers
> because parts of the template assumes Plasma, and perhaps Krita has a
> larger-than-average percentage of users who fall under category 3. What
> this really
>From the perspective of someone who triages non-Krita bugs, I would say that
>the template has been a big success. My observations (again, for non-Krita
>bugs) are as follows:
1. Technically adept users are now filing better bugs, because they are
faithfully filling out the template with
On maandag 8 oktober 2018 21:10:44 CEST Andrew Crouthamel wrote:
>
> If someone doesn't want to fill out everything, they don't have to. I've
> seen plenty of people deleting some of the template or not filling out some
> fields.
>
There's another problem: the template assumes people are using
On maandag 8 oktober 2018 21:10:44 CEST Andrew Crouthamel wrote:
>
> We had this previously, where the details were added in without any template
> and the bug reports were very lacking, always requiring follow-up work. The
> current template is at least producing bugs with higher quality
>
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, October 5, 2018 2:23 PM, Karl Ove Hufthammer wrote:
> BTW, is having to enter detailed metainfo in Bugzilla really
> neccesary? Currently, even for simple bugs, I have to enter:
[...]
>
> As a comparison, at GitHub, to file a bug, you just have to
Kai Uwe Broulik skreiv 05.10.2018 09:16:
I find it odd that you can write meaningful bugreports using DrKonqi
that include version information and find the correct component
whereas the "Report a bug" in "Help" just opens bugzilla webpage.
It does fill out the correct product and version
I do have a task on my to-do list for improving this using the new API we
can use nowadays. So, it's possible to make this lots better and just needs
coding really. If anyone wants to try I can mentor or give emotional
support :)
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018, 09:16 Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> Am 04.10.2018
Am 04.10.2018 um 22:11 schrieb Harald Sitter:
Oh btw, just as a random FYI: I think stuff like this is why ubuntu
eventually ended up having a GUI tool (ubuntu-bug) to help file bug
reports with useful metadata. Putting it on the user to figure this
stuff out is unreliable at best and can easily
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 10:27 AM Valorie Zimmerman
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 1:11 PM Harald Sitter wrote:
>>
>> Oh btw, just as a random FYI: I think stuff like this is why ubuntu
>> eventually ended up having a GUI tool (ubuntu-bug) to help file bug
>> reports with useful metadata.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:07 AM Harald Sitter wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 6:14 PM Nate Graham wrote:
> >
> > Can the template be overridden on a per-project basis?
>
> Yes.
>
> [% IF product.name == 'foobar' %]
> ...
> [% END %]
>
> I think making the template text more generically
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 1:11 PM Harald Sitter wrote:
> Oh btw, just as a random FYI: I think stuff like this is why ubuntu
> eventually ended up having a GUI tool (ubuntu-bug) to help file bug
> reports with useful metadata. Putting it on the user to figure this
> stuff out is unreliable at best
Oh btw, just as a random FYI: I think stuff like this is why ubuntu
eventually ended up having a GUI tool (ubuntu-bug) to help file bug
reports with useful metadata. Putting it on the user to figure this
stuff out is unreliable at best and can easily get overwhelming.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 6:14 PM Nate Graham wrote:
>
> Can the template be overridden on a per-project basis?
Yes.
[% IF product.name == 'foobar' %]
...
[% END %]
I think making the template text more generically applicable is more
reasonable though. Otherwise the about system bit can basically
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 at 21:06, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On donderdag 4 oktober 2018 21:01:37 CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > So I would imagine that quite general approach would be to allow "None"
> > value for Plasma version and even KF5 version (this covers non-KF5 apps).
> > "None" in contrast
On donderdag 4 oktober 2018 21:01:37 CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> So I would imagine that quite general approach would be to allow "None"
> value for Plasma version and even KF5 version (this covers non-KF5 apps).
> "None" in contrast to "Unknown".
That's not relevant. It isn't a matter of
So I would imagine that quite general approach would be to allow "None"
value for Plasma version and even KF5 version (this covers non-KF5 apps).
"None" in contrast to "Unknown".
PS: What's the link to the template please?
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 at 19:27, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 5:14 AM Nate Graham wrote:
>
> Can the template be overridden on a per-project basis?
It cannot be overridden on a per-project basis from my understanding.
Regards,
Ben
>
> Nate
>
>
> On 10/04/2018 07:48 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This section:
> >
> >
Yes, that would be much better.
On donderdag 4 oktober 2018 18:19:19 CEST Andrew Crouthamel wrote:
> Why not just something generic:
>
> SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
> Windows:
> MacOS:
> Linux/KDE Plasma:
> (available in About System)
> KDE Plasma Version:
> KDE Frameworks Version:
> Qt Version:
>
>
That sounds a lot better. Even on Linux kf5!=plasma .
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018, 12:19 PM Andrew Crouthamel
wrote:
> Why not just something generic:
>
> SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
> Windows:
> MacOS:
> Linux/KDE Plasma:
> (available in About System)
> KDE Plasma Version:
> KDE Frameworks Version:
> Qt
Why not just something generic:
SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
Windows:
MacOS:
Linux/KDE Plasma:
(available in About System)
KDE Plasma Version:
KDE Frameworks Version:
Qt Version:
Andrew Crouthamel
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, October 4, 2018 12:13 PM, Nate Graham wrote:
> Can the
Can the template be overridden on a per-project basis?
Nate
On 10/04/2018 07:48 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
Hi,
This section:
SOFTWARE VERSIONS
(available in About System)
KDE Plasma Version:
KDE Frameworks Version:
Qt Version:
In the template I've never seen filled out. One problem, of
24 matches
Mail list logo
