Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-29 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dijous, 29 de setembre de 2016, a les 9:32:00 CEST, Jonathan Riddell va escriure: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:28:37PM +0200, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Have you contacted the people that actually write docs if they are happy > > with you imposing a change on the docs they write? > > > >

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-29 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:28:37PM +0200, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Have you contacted the people that actually write docs if they are happy with > you imposing a change on the docs they write? > > CC'ing them just in case they did not see it. I'm not imposing :( It's a suggested change we're

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-28 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dimarts, 20 de setembre de 2016, a les 18:04:47 CEST, Jonathan Riddell va escriure: > Changed: > "Documentation must be licensed under the Creative Commons > Attribution-Sharealike 4.0 International" > Rationale: Currently we use GNU FDL but that licence is unmaintained, > little used,

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-28 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dimarts, 20 de setembre de 2016, a les 18:04:47 CEST, Jonathan Riddell va escriure: > It's time for a new updates to the KDE Licensing Policy kde-licens...@kde.org feels sad for not getting any news about this. Cheers, Albert

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-27 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 06:52:13PM +0200, Luigi Toscano wrote: > Still, as I mentioned, it would introduced problems if we move documentation > forth and back from wikis to other formats, and also with mixing content from > older documentation. It would allow sharing content from wikis.

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-23 Thread Riccardo Iaconelli
On 23 September 2016 at 18:52, Luigi Toscano wrote: > Still, as I mentioned, it would introduced problems if we move documentation > forth and back from wikis to other formats, and also with mixing content from > older documentation. I still don't buy the "cumbersome"

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-23 Thread Luigi Toscano
On Friday, 23 September 2016 16:46:22 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 06:41:57PM +0200, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > On 20 September 2016 at 19:04, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > > Added: > > > "Content on collaborative edited websites such

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-23 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 06:41:57PM +0200, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: > Hi all, > > On 20 September 2016 at 19:04, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > Added: > > "Content on collaborative edited websites such as wikis must be > > licensed under the Creative Commons

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-21 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 04:24:13PM +0200, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On dinsdag 20 september 2016 22:54:54 CEST Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > On the other hand: Is Qt still used much for web services? > > It may in the future. During QtCon, Lars Knoll mentioned to make Qt render to > web browser as

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-21 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On dinsdag 20 september 2016 22:54:54 CEST Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > On the other hand: Is Qt still used much for web services? It may in the future. During QtCon, Lars Knoll mentioned to make Qt render to web browser as one possible future goal. We also have vague plans for kwin to do that. >

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-21 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 09:19:26PM +0200, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > On 20.09.2016 19:52, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > >2016-09-20 14:04 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Riddell : > >>Added: > >>''Applications which are intended to be run on a server'' can be > >>licenced under the GNU AGPL 3.0 or

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-21 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 07:11:10PM +0200, Luigi Toscano wrote: > > Rationale: we have no policy for wikis but they are very important to > > us especially with wikitoLearn so we should add one. Our wikis are > > currently CC 3.0+FDL but we should consider moving to CC 4.0 (CC > > includes an or

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-21 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:42:55PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2016-09-20, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > Differences: > > Removed > > "code may not be copied from Qt into KDE Platform as Qt is LGPL 2.1" > > Rationale: Qt is now LGPL 3 as well as 2 > > Qt is not LGPL2.1 in

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 20 September 2016 at 22:54, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > Certainly not. AGPL is like GPL in that sense, with the extra rule >> that you must publish the source code even if you're only giving >> access over the network and not distributing binaries. >> >>

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
Certainly not. AGPL is like GPL in that sense, with the extra rule that you must publish the source code even if you're only giving access over the network and not distributing binaries. I don't think an AGPL library makes much sense though. ​ALGPL makes sense then :) ​ On

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 20 September 2016 at 22:00, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > 2016-09-20 16:53 GMT-03:00 Jaroslaw Staniek : > > > > > > On 20 September 2016 at 21:42, Nicolás Alvarez < > nicolas.alva...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> 2016-09-20 16:30 GMT-03:00 Jaroslaw

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Nicolás Alvarez
2016-09-20 16:53 GMT-03:00 Jaroslaw Staniek : > > > On 20 September 2016 at 21:42, Nicolás Alvarez > wrote: >> >> 2016-09-20 16:30 GMT-03:00 Jaroslaw Staniek : >> > >> > >> > On 20 September 2016 at 21:19, Thomas Pfeiffer

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Nicolás Alvarez
2016-09-20 16:30 GMT-03:00 Jaroslaw Staniek : > > > On 20 September 2016 at 21:19, Thomas Pfeiffer > wrote: >> >> On 20.09.2016 19:52, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: >>> >>> 2016-09-20 14:04 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Riddell : Added:

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 20 September 2016 at 21:19, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > On 20.09.2016 19:52, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > >> 2016-09-20 14:04 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Riddell : >> >>> Added: >>> ''Applications which are intended to be run on a server'' can be >>> licenced under

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On 20.09.2016 19:52, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: 2016-09-20 14:04 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Riddell : Added: ''Applications which are intended to be run on a server'' can be licenced under the GNU AGPL 3.0 or later Rationale: KDE Store code is under AGPL Question: should this be an

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 20 September 2016 at 20:42, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2016-09-20, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > Differences: > > Removed > > "code may not be copied from Qt into KDE Platform as Qt is LGPL 2.1" > > Rationale: Qt is now LGPL 3 as well as 2 > > Qt is not

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2016-09-20, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > Differences: > Removed > "code may not be copied from Qt into KDE Platform as Qt is LGPL 2.1" > Rationale: Qt is now LGPL 3 as well as 2 Qt is not LGPL2.1 in general. As long as we want to be LGPL2.1 compat, we can't copy code from Qt.