Re: KDE git docs for dummies ? WAS: Re: splitting up kdebase in git

2011-01-20 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:33:30PM -0600, Ian Monroe wrote: There is no push/merge/branching policy for KDE. Different projects will likely do their own thing. For the time being its just the SVN-style development translated to Git. words like unwise, stupid and utterly braindead come to

Re: KDE git docs for dummies ? WAS: Re: splitting up kdebase in git

2011-01-20 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, January 20, 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:33:30PM -0600, Ian Monroe wrote: There is no push/merge/branching policy for KDE. Different projects will likely do their own thing. For the time being its just the SVN-style development translated to Git.

Re: [PATCH] Re: KDE 4.6.0: go or no go?

2011-01-20 Thread Sebastian Trüg
This patch does in no way solve the issue. On 01/20/2011 02:00 PM, Dirk Mueller wrote: On Wednesday 19 January 2011, Dirk Mueller wrote: so the general consensus seems to be against slipping the schedule and inserting a RC3. This means that we need to solve bug 246678. Given that there

Re: [PATCH] Re: KDE 4.6.0: go or no go?

2011-01-20 Thread Ian Monroe
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 08:18, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote: This patch does in no way solve the issue. I'm not sure what the release team is supposed to do with this statement. What do you think of 246678 and the 4.6.0 release? Ian

Re: KDE git docs for dummies ? WAS: Re: splitting up kdebase in git

2011-01-20 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Tom Albers wrote: - Original Message - On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:33:30PM -0600, Ian Monroe wrote: There is no push/merge/branching policy for KDE. Different projects will likely do their own thing. For the time being its just the SVN-style

Re: KDE git docs for dummies ? WAS: Re: splitting up kdebase in git

2011-01-20 Thread Parker Coates
2011/1/20 Alexander Neundorf: As long as there is no policy defined, I simply try to push/merge to the respective master ? I also think that really most/all new KDE git repositories should use a common workflow. I think this is a reasonable expectation for all repositories that are part of

Re: Moving nepomuk-system-tray to kdereview

2011-01-20 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Dijous, 20 de gener de 2011, Artem Serebriyskiy va escriure: I planned to write a plasma aplet with same purpose that will use plugins. This idea is currently suspended and its necessity is questionable. If you ever do you'll have rework your Messages.sh and/or make sure you load the

Re: Moving nepomuk-system-tray to kdereview

2011-01-20 Thread Artem Serebriyskiy
I planned to write a plasma aplet with same purpose that will use plugins. This idea is currently suspended and its necessity is questionable. On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: A Dilluns, 17 de gener de 2011, Artem Serebriyskiy va escriure: Hi

Re: KDE git docs for dummies ? WAS: Re: splitting up kdebase in git

2011-01-20 Thread Ben Cooksley
2011/1/21 Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org: On Thursday 20 January 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: On Wednesday, January 19, 2011, Alexander Neundorf wrote: http://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/GitKdeOrgManual looks quite ok for somebody who knows how to use git for KDE, but not for me. Can