On Friday 28 January 2011 00.06.21 Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
John Tapsell wrote:
2011/1/27 Nicolás Alvarez nicolas.alva...@gmail.com:
Please, help review the repositories before migration! Unlike KDE
software, here we won't have point releases to fix bugs later :)
I have quite a few
On Friday 28 January 2011 11.05.43 Johannes Sixt wrote:
Am 1/28/2011 10:31, schrieb Torgny Nyblom:
On Friday 28 January 2011 00.06.21 Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
John Tapsell wrote:
2011/1/27 Nicolás Alvarez nicolas.alva...@gmail.com:
Please, help review the repositories before migration!
Am 1/28/2011 12:19, schrieb Torgny Nyblom:
On Friday 28 January 2011 11.05.43 Johannes Sixt wrote:
Doesn't it operate with a git-fast-import stream? Wouldn't it just mean to
flip a LF to a SP here and there? You wouldn't even have to change the
byte-length of the commit messages.
Well yes,
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 05:27, Johannes Sixt j.s...@viscovery.net wrote:
Am 1/28/2011 12:19, schrieb Torgny Nyblom:
On Friday 28 January 2011 11.05.43 Johannes Sixt wrote:
Doesn't it operate with a git-fast-import stream? Wouldn't it just mean to
flip a LF to a SP here and there? You wouldn't
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:42, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
On Monday 24 January 2011 00:13:26 Eike Hein wrote:
Yep - for the benefit of those who aren't used to the git
jargon (sorry for that), in git the convention is to for-
mat the commit message like this:
single line of about 50 chars,
On Friday 28 January 2011 16.13.31 Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
Ian Monroe wrote:
For up to one week if someone finds a major problem in the history a
re-push will be considered. After that we'll just live with it.
...but far better would be for any problem to be found now. Please
note that
