---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101173/
---
(Updated April 27, 2011, 7:28 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs and David
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101174/#review2915
---
This review has been submitted with commit
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Torgny Nyblom k...@nyblom.org wrote:
+1 a module is a unit and should be treated as such even if the different apps
are in different gits.
So should I move the code to SVN then? This discussion was on
kde-games-devel already, and the mass figured it's quite
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:40:08AM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
I know we decided to use cherry-picks to bring commits from past versions to
master, but this has caused that the 4.5 and 4.6 commits are never in the
past
history of master.
which is the state we had with svn. it was
Em Wednesday, 27 de April de 2011, às 12:46:40, Oswald Buddenhagen escreveu:
if you want to make that git feature useful in the kde-ish cherry-pick
regime, tag the stable branch points - if you want to know when a commit
on a stable branch hit master, you need the extra step of following the
- Original Message -
(oh well, who
cares,
given all that scripty crap in the history)
I consider our translations very important for KDE. Would be nice if people -in
general- do not consider translations and the contributors working on that as
second class community members. Calling
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101219/#review2924
---
Ship it!
That's a no brainer.
Please, ship it. As a side
On Wednesday 27 April 2011, John Layt wrote:
On Wednesday 27 Apr 2011 17:52:32 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Wednesday 27 April 2011, Thiago Macieira wrote:
I know we decided to use cherry-picks to bring commits from past
versions to master,
Is this what is described here ?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101173/#review2926
---
kioslave/ftp/ftp.cpp
Hi, John and Feng Huang,
It's glad to see the interests on this old topic.
Sorry, I forgot to update the info about relicense of ccal(at least
part for chinese calendar date calculate). My change is in
http://code.google.com/p/kcalendar/source/browse/trunk/README
Yes, I also updated the link
On April 27, 2011, 7:58 p.m., David Faure wrote:
kioslave/ftp/ftp.cpp, line 605
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101173/diff/3/?file=15471#file15471line605
Oh, I thought we could remove the boolean altogether.
I don't really understand the way the patch works. The
On Wednesday 27 Apr 2011 19:59:05 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
I mean, I can help with simple things.
If we agree that the following pages should be gone
http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Git
http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Git/Pushing
On April 27, 2011, 11:42 p.m., David Faure wrote:
kioslave/ftp/ftp.cpp, line 367
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101173/diff/4/?file=15510#file15510line367
Sorry, I still have a question.
After a username change, setHost is going to be called, right? So it
will
13 matches
Mail list logo
