Re: RFC: i18n: drop KUIT tags in KDE Frameworks 5.0?

2012-03-30 Thread Chusslove Illich
[: Stefan Majewsky :] I'm missing one point in this statistic: How big would the percentage be if KUIT was used in every relevant string? That is the main point of uncertainty. In here: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-develm=133258732919686w=2 I made the best estimate I could think of so

Re: RFC: i18n: drop KUIT tags in KDE Frameworks 5.0?

2012-03-30 Thread Chusslove Illich
[: Albert Astals Cid :] Discipline is not a problem [...] [...] I agree optional is a bad idea. [...] OTOH it's another hurdle for adoption of current code from KDE 4 to KF5, that originally was said to be transparent for developers and each day is getting to look more like a bigger

Re: Review Request: Make KAuth ready for frameworks + API Changes

2012-03-30 Thread Dario Freddi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104337/#review12013 --- April is upon us. If no objections arise in the time being,

Re: Review Request: Make KAuth ready for frameworks + API Changes

2012-03-30 Thread Stephen Kelly
On March 30, 2012, 1:14 p.m., Dario Freddi wrote: April is upon us. If no objections arise in the time being, these changes will be merged on Sunday, after which I'll ask Kevin to move KAuth back to tier2/ for prime time. Thanks for making this happen! :) Instead of merging, please

Re: Review Request: Make KAuth ready for frameworks + API Changes

2012-03-30 Thread Dario Freddi
On March 30, 2012, 1:14 p.m., Dario Freddi wrote: April is upon us. If no objections arise in the time being, these changes will be merged on Sunday, after which I'll ask Kevin to move KAuth back to tier2/ for prime time. Stephen Kelly wrote: Thanks for making this happen! :)

Re: Review Request: Copy files instead of moving if parent dir is not writable

2012-03-30 Thread Lamarque Vieira Souza
On March 30, 2012, 8:18 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: service/jobs/nepomuk/Move.cpp, line 352 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104417/diff/5/?file=55320#file55320line352 !QUrl::isLocalFile()? isLocalFile() was introduced in Qt 4.8.0 and we still use Qt 4.7.4 in Meego image. -

Re: Review Request: Copy files instead of moving if parent dir is not writable

2012-03-30 Thread Thomas Lübking
On March 30, 2012, 8:18 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: service/jobs/nepomuk/Move.cpp, line 352 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104417/diff/5/?file=55320#file55320line352 !QUrl::isLocalFile()? Lamarque Vieira Souza wrote: isLocalFile() was introduced in Qt 4.8.0 and we still

kdelibs splitting: collecting March results

2012-03-30 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello list, For this month I decided to be a bit more relax and not chase after people and see how it goes. Which means this email is going to be probably shorter than usual. :-) So, for this month were earmarked to be splitted out: * kauth; * kcoreaddons (left over from february); *

Re: Review Request: Copy files instead of moving if parent dir is not writable

2012-03-30 Thread Lamarque Vieira Souza
On March 30, 2012, 8:18 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: service/jobs/nepomuk/Move.cpp, line 352 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104417/diff/5/?file=55320#file55320line352 !QUrl::isLocalFile()? Lamarque Vieira Souza wrote: isLocalFile() was introduced in Qt 4.8.0 and we still

Re: Review Request: Make KAuth ready for frameworks + API Changes

2012-03-30 Thread Kevin Ottens
On March 30, 2012, 1:14 p.m., Dario Freddi wrote: April is upon us. If no objections arise in the time being, these changes will be merged on Sunday, after which I'll ask Kevin to move KAuth back to tier2/ for prime time. Stephen Kelly wrote: Thanks for making this happen! :)