Hi,
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Rolf Eike Beer
k...@opensource.sf-tec.dewrote:
Am Donnerstag, 17. Mai 2012, 13:30:24 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
Hi,
I think this techbase article is pretty much up-to-date. I guess the
KDElibsNighly.cmake file should simply be deleted.
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 10:52 -0400, Dawit A wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Ben Martin
monke...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I'm wondering if there is a timeframe for KIO refresh in KDE5?
Getting improved metadata handling in there would be a great
On Sunday 20 May 2012 10:08:11 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Rolf Eike Beer k...@opensource.sf-
tec.dewrote:
Am Donnerstag, 17. Mai 2012, 13:30:24 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
Hi,
I think this techbase article is pretty much up-to-date. I guess the
Am Sonntag, 20. Mai 2012, 12:55:54 schrieb Volker Krause:
On Sunday 20 May 2012 10:08:11 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Anyway, I guess the guys ultimately knowning how this is done for kdelibs
are Alex or Volker...
I'm not using those scripts either. My nightly build just calls ctest
directly,
On Sunday 20 May 2012, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Sonntag, 20. Mai 2012, 12:55:54 schrieb Volker Krause:
On Sunday 20 May 2012 10:08:11 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Anyway, I guess the guys ultimately knowning how this is done for
kdelibs are Alex or Volker...
techbase doesn't seem to answer
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104907/#review14001
---
This review has been submitted with commit
On May 13, 2012, 2:07 p.m., Maks Orlovich wrote:
Any performance effect?
With sunspider, out of 10x10 runs with and without the patch, this turns out to
be a small performance improvement.
As I really couldn't believe it I reverted everything and tested again, but the
results are the same.
