Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-17 Thread Antonis Tsiapaliokas
Hello, Attached, can somebody give it a try ? Alex I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work. With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached patch needed. Regards, Antonis

kdelibs branches

2012-12-17 Thread David Faure
Now that all modules have a KDE/4.10 branch, kdelibs can use again the same workflow as the other modules: 4.10 for the 4.10.x series, and master for the 4.11.x series. This will create less confusion than a frozen master and a different branching date. However, kdelibs master is STILL feature

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-17 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 17 December 2012, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 00:03:38, Luigi Toscano va escriure: Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23,

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-17 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Sunday 16 December 2012, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote: Hello, Attached, can somebody give it a try ? Alex I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work. With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached patch needed. The attached patch should

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-17 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.orgwrote: Not really. For the frameworks branch the most current cmake is required, which is 2.8.10.1 currently. We will stay there with the most current until we get somewhat stable. I see. My post seems to date back then

Review Request: Make Dr.Konqi remember and showuse the time when the crash happend

2012-12-17 Thread Jekyll Wu
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107775/ --- Review request for KDE Runtime and George Kiagiadakis. Description

kdepimlibs dependency on nepomuk-core breaks build for Calligra and kdeplasma-addons

2012-12-17 Thread Ben Cooksley
Hi all, Currently build.kde.org is unable to successfully complete builds of kdeplasma-addons and Calligra due to recent changes in kdepimlibs. These changes are a port from Nepomuk (part of kdelibs) to NepomukCore (a seperate repository). As kdepimlibs uses the *Config.cmake method of exporting

Re: kdepimlibs dependency on nepomuk-core breaks build for Calligra and kdeplasma-addons

2012-12-17 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 17 December 2012, Ben Cooksley wrote: Hi all, Currently build.kde.org is unable to successfully complete builds of kdeplasma-addons and Calligra due to recent changes in kdepimlibs. These changes are a port from Nepomuk (part of kdelibs) to NepomukCore (a seperate repository).

Re: kdepimlibs dependency on nepomuk-core breaks build for Calligra and kdeplasma-addons

2012-12-17 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote: On Monday 17 December 2012, Ben Cooksley wrote: Hi all, Currently build.kde.org is unable to successfully complete builds of kdeplasma-addons and Calligra due to recent changes in kdepimlibs. These changes are a port

Re: kdepimlibs dependency on nepomuk-core breaks build for Calligra and kdeplasma-addons

2012-12-17 Thread Pino Toscano
Alle lunedì 17 dicembre 2012, Ben Cooksley ha scritto: Currently build.kde.org is unable to successfully complete builds of kdeplasma-addons and Calligra due to recent changes in kdepimlibs. These changes are a port from Nepomuk (part of kdelibs) to NepomukCore (a seperate repository). As

Re: kdepimlibs dependency on nepomuk-core breaks build for Calligra and kdeplasma-addons

2012-12-17 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 17 December 2012, Pino Toscano wrote: Alle lunedì 17 dicembre 2012, Ben Cooksley ha scritto: Currently build.kde.org is unable to successfully complete builds of kdeplasma-addons and Calligra due to recent changes in kdepimlibs. These changes are a port from Nepomuk (part of

Re: kdepimlibs dependency on nepomuk-core breaks build for Calligra and kdeplasma-addons

2012-12-17 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 17 December 2012, Ben Cooksley wrote: On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote: On Monday 17 December 2012, Ben Cooksley wrote: Hi all, Currently build.kde.org is unable to successfully complete builds of kdeplasma-addons and Calligra due to

Re: kdepimlibs dependency on nepomuk-core breaks build for Calligra and kdeplasma-addons

2012-12-17 Thread Andreas Pakulat
Hi, On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote: Currently build.kde.org is unable to successfully complete builds of kdeplasma-addons and Calligra due to recent changes in kdepimlibs. These changes are a port from Nepomuk (part of kdelibs) to NepomukCore (a seperate

Re: kdepimlibs dependency on nepomuk-core breaks build for Calligra and kdeplasma-addons

2012-12-17 Thread Pino Toscano
Alle lunedì 17 dicembre 2012, Alexander Neundorf ha scritto: On Monday 17 December 2012, Pino Toscano wrote: Alle lunedì 17 dicembre 2012, Ben Cooksley ha scritto: Currently build.kde.org is unable to successfully complete builds of kdeplasma-addons and Calligra due to recent changes in

Re: Review Request: port sonnet away from i18nc

2012-12-17 Thread Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107412/ --- (Updated Dec. 17, 2012, 8:05 p.m.) Review request for kdelibs and David

Re: kdepimlibs dependency on nepomuk-core breaks build for Calligra and kdeplasma-addons

2012-12-17 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 17 December 2012, Pino Toscano wrote: Alle lunedì 17 dicembre 2012, Alexander Neundorf ha scritto: On Monday 17 December 2012, Pino Toscano wrote: Alle lunedì 17 dicembre 2012, Ben Cooksley ha scritto: Currently build.kde.org is unable to successfully complete builds of

Review Request: port Sonnet to QSettings

2012-12-17 Thread Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107791/ --- Review request for kdelibs and David Faure. Description --- Ported

Re: Review Request: port Sonnet to QSettings

2012-12-17 Thread Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107791/ --- (Updated Dec. 17, 2012, 9:15 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks,

Re: rekonq 2 merged in rekonq main repository

2012-12-17 Thread David Faure
On Sunday 16 December 2012 18:41:31 andrea diamantini wrote: - New private browsing mode (NOT based on KIO, as it seems our cookiejar is not enough malleable for it. At least in kde4) Are you working on patches to make it malleable enough in the future? If you need something, make it happen,

cmake.git (Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master)

2012-12-17 Thread David Faure
[How many lists do I need to read this thread on? Cutting the cross-posting off] On Monday 17 December 2012 17:46:51 Laszlo Papp wrote: PS.: If only the entry barrier was not so high for even a basic tool like cmake. It is certainly not a problem for me as an arch user, but I can understand

Re: cmake.git (Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master)

2012-12-17 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Am Montag, 17. Dezember 2012, 23:11:14 schrieb David Faure: [How many lists do I need to read this thread on? Cutting the cross-posting off] On Monday 17 December 2012 17:46:51 Laszlo Papp wrote: PS.: If only the entry barrier was not so high for even a basic tool like cmake. It is

Re: Review Request: port Sonnet to QSettings

2012-12-17 Thread Kevin Krammer
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107791/#review23643 --- IMHO this is wrong. Not code wise but conceptual. As far as I

Re: Review Request: port Sonnet to QSettings

2012-12-17 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Dec. 17, 2012, 10:38 p.m., Kevin Krammer wrote: IMHO this is wrong. Not code wise but conceptual. As far as I understand QSettings is basically deprecated, it is just not official marked as such because there is no replacement. This would be porting away from a fully functional,

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-17 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:37:59, Alexander Neundorf va escriure: On Sunday 16 December 2012, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote: Hello, Attached, can somebody give it a try ? Alex I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work. With the 2.8.9

Re: rekonq 2 merged in rekonq main repository

2012-12-17 Thread andrea diamantini
Yes, I'm obviously trying. My first attempt was a tiny change in the KCookieServer/KCookieJar API to let people search just for persistent cookies. But it failed. I'm currently working on a second attempt following the same approach. If not, I though about implementing a different jar for the