On 6 November 2013 03:49, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, the schema says the latter is invalid. Is the schema
wrong or intltool wrong?
This is what we do in GNOME:
On Wednesday, 2013-11-06, 08:40:56, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 6 November 2013 03:49, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com
wrote:
If we have to do it by paragraph, having scripty merge the
translations back into the original XML is going to be ugly...
The reasons I chose to do it
On Wednesday 06 November 2013 00:04:47 Matthias Klumpp wrote:
Btw, thinks like Plasmoids might make sense to be only displayed on
KDE, because they aren't useful on GNOME (same applies for GNOME-Shell
Extensions on KDE). If these things would be treated as applications
in software-centers, I
On Wednesday, November 6, 2013 00:04:47 Matthias Klumpp wrote:
Plasmoids might make sense to be only displayed on KDE
...
Extensions on KDE). If these things would be treated as applications
This is honestly an area where I don’t see much point in pushing AppStream
further.
As a front-end for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113630/#review43145
---
Ship it!
Please add the missing license before pushing.
On 6 November 2013 08:55, Kevin Krammer kram...@kde.org wrote:
Do you expect to support partial translations? I.e. one paragraph translated,
followed by an untranslated one?
Sure, we support that. Imagine the following paragraphs in locale C:
pThis is what the color management program does:/p
On Wednesday, 2013-11-06, 12:55:40, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 6 November 2013 08:55, Kevin Krammer kram...@kde.org wrote:
Do you expect to support partial translations? I.e. one paragraph
translated, followed by an untranslated one?
Sure, we support that. Imagine the following paragraphs in
On Wednesday, November 06, 2013 12:43:58 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimarts, 5 de novembre de 2013, a les 15:17:05, Aleix Pol va escriure:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Allen Winter win...@kde.org wrote:
On Saturday, November 02, 2013 12:15:15 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Hi,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112235/#review43185
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112234/#review43186
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112258/#review43187
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112258/#review43189
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112258/
---
(Updated Nov. 6, 2013, 7:07 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112234/
---
(Updated Nov. 6, 2013, 7:07 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112234/#review43188
---
This review has been submitted with commit
On 6 November 2013 20:51, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
For instance, in Fedora we're probably going to be stuck with having
AppData included as SourceN files in SRPMs for quite some time.
No, if this is the case then I've failed. I want the AppData files to
live upstream,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113630/#review43192
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113630/
---
(Updated Nov. 6, 2013, 9:46 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
18 matches
Mail list logo
