El Dilluns, 26 de gener de 2015, a les 11:13:57, Jeremy Whiting va escriure:
Eike,
Thanks for looking into this and notifying us also. I heard some vague
reports but nothing concrete like this.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Eike Hein h...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
it's becoming
Hi,
it's becoming increasingly clear from feedback that we didn't
think the decision to ship KF5 apps in 14.12 through very well.
Distros are currently rolling it out as an upgrade to KDE 4
systems over the last 4.x apps, and users are running into the
following problems:
* KF5-based apps
On Jan. 21, 2015, 10:10 vorm., Dominik Haumann wrote:
processcore/process.h, line 40
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121831/diff/3/?file=343193#file343193line40
Is virtual needed here?
Gregor Mi wrote:
Does it hurt here to have it virtual? I thought, if in doubt 'virtual'
On Jan. 21, 2015, 10:10 vorm., Dominik Haumann wrote:
processcore/process.h, line 40
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121831/diff/3/?file=343193#file343193line40
Is virtual needed here?
Gregor Mi wrote:
Does it hurt here to have it virtual? I thought, if in doubt 'virtual'
On Montag, 26. Januar 2015 01:38:54 CET, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Thomas Lübking wrote:
If you had followed the discussion or at least looked at that feature
matrix Milian started and that you liked to high-handedly deem as rubbish,
you'd have noticed that webfrontends to upload patches (like
On Jan. 21, 2015, 10:10 vorm., Dominik Haumann wrote:
processcore/process.h, line 40
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121831/diff/3/?file=343193#file343193line40
Is virtual needed here?
Gregor Mi wrote:
Does it hurt here to have it virtual? I thought, if in doubt 'virtual'
Hi,
sorry for chiming in late.
On Sunday 14 December 2014 18:57:44 Tobias Leupold wrote:
recently, I requested to move libkface from extragear/libs to to
kdegraphics/libs, because KPhotoAlbum began to use it as the first
non-Digikam
program. This has been done in the meantime and now, we
On Jan. 21, 2015, 10:10 vorm., Dominik Haumann wrote:
processcore/process.h, line 40
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121831/diff/3/?file=343193#file343193line40
Is virtual needed here?
Gregor Mi wrote:
Does it hurt here to have it virtual? I thought, if in doubt 'virtual'
Eike,
Thanks for looking into this and notifying us also. I heard some vague
reports but nothing concrete like this.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Eike Hein h...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
it's becoming increasingly clear from feedback that we didn't
think the decision to ship KF5 apps in 14.12
On Jan. 26, 2015, 7:05 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
My opinion is that this is a feature which should not be exposed in
libksysguard. It actually ties libksysguard to KWin, while libksysguard was
in the past also used in e.g. kdevelop.
If libksysguard wants to offer the
On Jan. 21, 2015, 10:10 vorm., Dominik Haumann wrote:
processcore/process.h, line 40
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121831/diff/3/?file=343193#file343193line40
Is virtual needed here?
Gregor Mi wrote:
Does it hurt here to have it virtual? I thought, if in doubt 'virtual'
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122252/#review74753
---
Looks reasonable to me. I'll apply the patch locally and test
On Jan. 26, 2015, 7:05 vorm., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
My opinion is that this is a feature which should not be exposed in
libksysguard. It actually ties libksysguard to KWin, while libksysguard was
in the past also used in e.g. kdevelop.
If libksysguard wants to offer the
Hi,
sorry for chiming in late.
On Sunday 14 December 2014 18:57:44 Tobias Leupold wrote:
recently, I requested to move libkface from extragear/libs to to
kdegraphics/libs, because KPhotoAlbum began to use it as the first
non-Digikam
program. This has been done in the meantime and now, we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122270/#review74800
---
googling for KDE_MULTIHEAD revealed the real world use case
On Samstag, 24. Januar 2015 15:24:28 CET, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
But beyond review functionality, I think moving towards a more
integrated solution is clearly a step in the right direction, and this
is what makes the choice of Phabricator over Gerrit a clear case to me.
I assume we all
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122270/
---
Review request for kde-workspace, Aleix Pol Gonzalez, Martin Gräßlin, and
On Jan. 26, 2015, 8:05 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
My opinion is that this is a feature which should not be exposed in
libksysguard. It actually ties libksysguard to KWin, while libksysguard was
in the past also used in e.g. kdevelop.
If libksysguard wants to offer the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122270/#review74806
---
startkde/kcminit/main.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122267/#review74809
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Cristian Oneț
On Jan. 27, 2015, 12:55
On Jan. 21, 2015, 10:10 a.m., Dominik Haumann wrote:
processcore/process.h, line 40
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121831/diff/3/?file=343193#file343193line40
Is virtual needed here?
Does it hurt here to have it virtual? I thought, if in doubt 'virtual' should
be used.
On
On Jan. 25, 2015, 5:28 p.m., Alex Richardson wrote:
processui/scripting.h, line 74
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121831/diff/5/?file=344700#file344700line74
Isn't just changing the PROPERTY macro enough?
Or is it used in some other file?
Gregor Mi wrote:
I did the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121831/
---
(Updated Jan. 25, 2015, 10:20 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Base Apps,
El Dijous, 1 de gener de 2015, a les 23:40:21, Albert Astals Cid va escriure:
El Dijous, 1 de gener de 2015, a les 23:23:16, Gilles Caulier va escriure:
2015-01-01 23:16 GMT+01:00 Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org:
El Diumenge, 21 de desembre de 2014, a les 19:39:27, Tobias Leupold va
On Jan. 25, 2015, 10:11 p.m., Milian Wolff wrote:
kdeui/tests/krecursivefilterproxymodeltest.cpp, line 26
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/17/diff/1/?file=344391#file344391line26
is this still required in qt5? this should really be added upstream,
imo...
I don't see this
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121831/
---
(Updated Jan. 25, 2015, 10:27 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Base Apps,
Thomas Lübking wrote:
If you had followed the discussion or at least looked at that feature
matrix Milian started and that you liked to high-handedly deem as rubbish,
you'd have noticed that webfrontends to upload patches (like suggested
https://tools.wmflabs.org/gerrit-patch-uploader/) are
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121831/
---
(Updated Jan. 25, 2015, 10:08 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Base Apps,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122252/#review74727
---
Ship it!
some nitpicks, but otherwise looks good to me, esp.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/17/#review74725
---
Ship it!
Looking at the code, I can't see anything obvious,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/17/#review74744
---
Ship it!
I tested this over the weekend. It fixes the
On Jan. 26, 2015, 8:05 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
My opinion is that this is a feature which should not be exposed in
libksysguard. It actually ties libksysguard to KWin, while libksysguard was
in the past also used in e.g. kdevelop.
If libksysguard wants to offer the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122249/#review74740
---
My opinion is that this is a feature which should not be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/17/
---
(Updated Jan. 26, 2015, 8:16 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122267/
---
Review request for kdelibs and Nicolás Alvarez.
Repository: ki18n
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122267/
---
(Updated Jan. 26, 2015, 5:55 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs, kdewin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122268/
---
(Updated Jan. 26, 2015, 5:54 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs, kdewin,
37 matches
Mail list logo
