On February 28, 2015 1:20:27 PM CET, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org wrote:
Then data will all be under ~/Library/Application Support/Qt5/appname ?
I think Ian's idea was not to use the appname bit (for stuff shared with other
apps).
that's a bit cleaner, but why would Qt/KDE applications
On Friday 27 February 2015 22:55:18 Alex Merry wrote:
On Friday 27 February 2015 13:29:59 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Alex Merry alex.me...@kde.org wrote:
4. Use the PATH_VARS to ecm_configure_package_config_file().
ecm_configure_package_config_file()
On Saturday February 28 2015 18:12:40 Ian Wadham wrote:
One problem is that these are NOT exactly like ~/.local/share,
/usr/local/share,
~/.local/share/APPNAME and /usr/local/share/APPNAME on Linux.
...
A bundle identifier is something like org.kde.appname. Actually, on my
system I find:
On Saturday February 28 2015 22:00:07 Ian Wadham wrote:
Hi Ian,
Esprit d'escalier. We could change GenericDataDir in QStandardPaths to be:
~/Library/Application Support/Qt5, /Library/Application Support/Qt5
That would work for ALL applications that use Qt5 and QSP, regardless of
Hi Jeremy,
My apologies for going back to basics. Some things you said earlier made me
think we are not on the same page, but I now see that we are.
On 02/03/2015, at 3:15 AM, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
The example code you've given does already use prefixes. I'll explain below.
On Sat, Feb
Hi René,
On 01/03/2015, at 8:17 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Sunday March 01 2015 17:37:35 Ian Wadham wrote:
Let me kick off by saying that I am not necessarily in favour of doing what
the Romans do… ;-)
Heh, I got that! :)
Yeah, but I am keeping an open mind…
And I do not like
On 十二月 8, 2014, 9:07 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
this is wrong - please have a look at various frameworks on how to do it
properly. In the end it should be:
#if HAVE_X11
// x11 specific stuff
#endif
obviously it also needs a runtime check:
if (QX11Info::isPlatformX11())
On Dec. 8, 2014, 3:07 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
this is wrong - please have a look at various frameworks on how to do it
properly. In the end it should be:
#if HAVE_X11
// x11 specific stuff
#endif
obviously it also needs a runtime check:
if (QX11Info::isPlatformX11())
On 十二月 8, 2014, 9:07 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
this is wrong - please have a look at various frameworks on how to do it
properly. In the end it should be:
#if HAVE_X11
// x11 specific stuff
#endif
obviously it also needs a runtime check:
if (QX11Info::isPlatformX11())
On 十二月 8, 2014, 9:07 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
this is wrong - please have a look at various frameworks on how to do it
properly. In the end it should be:
#if HAVE_X11
// x11 specific stuff
#endif
obviously it also needs a runtime check:
if (QX11Info::isPlatformX11())
On Dec. 8, 2014, 3:07 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
this is wrong - please have a look at various frameworks on how to do it
properly. In the end it should be:
#if HAVE_X11
// x11 specific stuff
#endif
obviously it also needs a runtime check:
if (QX11Info::isPlatformX11())
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121390/
---
(Updated March 1, 2015, 10:02 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
12 matches
Mail list logo
