Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

2017-01-05 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:38 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Am 2017-01-05 11:20, schrieb Ben Cooksley: >> >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Martin Gräßlin >> wrote: >>> >>> Am 2017-01-05 09:44, schrieb Ben Cooksley: Hi all,

Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

2017-01-05 Thread Adriaan de Groot
I think there's a middle ground to be found between dog-piling on Martin and letting things slide; a middle ground between dependency-creep and sticking to a stale platform. So let's step back for a moment and ask "what went wrong?" (and try to answer that carefully!), "what is the impact?" and

Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

2017-01-05 Thread Martin Gräßlin
Am 2017-01-05 21:13, schrieb Alexander Neundorf: On 2017 M01 5, Thu 16:11:43 CET Kevin Kofler wrote: Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: >> It should be rather obvious that we don't introduce new dependencies >> because we like to. There is a very

Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

2017-01-05 Thread Martin Gräßlin
Am 2017-01-05 16:11, schrieb Kevin Kofler: Ben Cooksley wrote: On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: It should be rather obvious that we don't introduce new dependencies because we like to. There is a very important software reason to it. That's the case for the xkbcommon

Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

2017-01-05 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On 2017 M01 5, Thu 16:11:43 CET Kevin Kofler wrote: > Ben Cooksley wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > >> It should be rather obvious that we don't introduce new dependencies > >> because we like to. There is a very important software reason to it. > >> That's the

Re: announcement: plymouth-kcm in kdereview

2017-01-05 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On 5 January 2017 at 15:03, Marco Martin wrote: > On Thursday 05 January 2017 12:30:38 Jonathan Riddell wrote: >> It should rather follow Plasma practice and set these in the top cmake file >> set(PROJECT_VERSION "5.8.90") >> set(PROJECT_VERSION_MAJOR 5) >> >> and use

Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

2017-01-05 Thread Kevin Kofler
Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: >> It should be rather obvious that we don't introduce new dependencies >> because we like to. There is a very important software reason to it. >> That's the case for the xkbcommon dependency increase. Should I have let

Re: announcement: plymouth-kcm in kdereview

2017-01-05 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 05 January 2017 12:30:38 Jonathan Riddell wrote: > It should rather follow Plasma practice and set these in the top cmake file > set(PROJECT_VERSION "5.8.90") > set(PROJECT_VERSION_MAJOR 5) > > and use PROJECT_VERSION would this number be automagically updated one this gets into

Re: announcement: plymouth-kcm in kdereview

2017-01-05 Thread Luigi Toscano
Jonathan Riddell ha scritto: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 12:58:10PM +0100, Marco Martin wrote: >> Hi all, >> announcing a new KCM module to change the plymouth splash screen >> The repository is named plymouth-kcm and is headed for kdereview now. >> its final resting place would be the workspace

Re: announcement: plymouth-kcm in kdereview

2017-01-05 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 12:58:10PM +0100, Marco Martin wrote: > Hi all, > announcing a new KCM module to change the plymouth splash screen > The repository is named plymouth-kcm and is headed for kdereview now. > its final resting place would be the workspace area, to be released in sync > with

Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

2017-01-05 Thread Martin Gräßlin
Am 2017-01-05 11:20, schrieb Ben Cooksley: On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: Am 2017-01-05 09:44, schrieb Ben Cooksley: Hi all, It seems that my previous vocal complaints about system level / serious impact dependency bumps on the CI system

Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

2017-01-05 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Am 2017-01-05 09:44, schrieb Ben Cooksley: >> >> Hi all, >> >> It seems that my previous vocal complaints about system level / >> serious impact dependency bumps on the CI system have gone completely >>

Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

2017-01-05 Thread Martin Gräßlin
Sorry picked wrong from address Am 2017-01-05 10:28, schrieb Martin Gräßlin: Am 2017-01-05 09:44, schrieb Ben Cooksley: Hi all, It seems that my previous vocal complaints about system level / serious impact dependency bumps on the CI system have gone completely unnoticed by (some) members of

Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

2017-01-05 Thread David Faure
On jeudi 5 janvier 2017 21:44:23 CET Ben Cooksley wrote: > Hi all, > > It seems that my previous vocal complaints about system level / > serious impact dependency bumps on the CI system have gone completely > unnoticed by (some) members of our Community. > > This was demonstrated earlier this

CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

2017-01-05 Thread Ben Cooksley
Hi all, It seems that my previous vocal complaints about system level / serious impact dependency bumps on the CI system have gone completely unnoticed by (some) members of our Community. This was demonstrated earlier this week when components of Plasma bumped their version requirements for