On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> any objection into pulling it into a framework? anything particular for the
> procedure?
as an update to that, i've update its cmake files and metadata files
to be coherent with other frameworks, at this point i'll wait a
On 1 September 2017 at 12:39, Jan Grulich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On pátek 1. září 2017 12:46:54 CEST Shaheed Haque wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The Python bindings effort recently ran into the need for
>> https://phabricator.kde.org/D5185 to prevent clashes between Qt's use
>> of
Hi,
On pátek 1. září 2017 12:46:54 CEST Shaheed Haque wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Python bindings effort recently ran into the need for
> https://phabricator.kde.org/D5185 to prevent clashes between Qt's use
> of "signals" and libnm via networkmanager-qt's ipconfig.h. However, it
> seems to me that
Hi all,
The Python bindings effort recently ran into the need for
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5185 to prevent clashes between Qt's use
of "signals" and libnm via networkmanager-qt's ipconfig.h. However, it
seems to me that the fix is incomplete in current Git master as there
are at least two