nevermind looking at really old mail I never deleted.
Jan 29, 2024 9:08:13 PM Michael Reeves :
> could someone please inform scrpty that 1.11 is the new kf5 stavble branch.
> 1.10 is no longer being released.
>
> Nov 1, 2023 11:12:29 PM reporter123 (@reporter123) :
>
>>
>> *reporter123
could someone please inform scrpty that 1.11 is the new kf5 stavble branch.
1.10 is no longer being released.
Nov 1, 2023 11:12:29 PM reporter123 (@reporter123) :
>
> *reporter123 pushed to branch 1.10 at reporter123 /
> kdiff3[https://gitlab.com/reporter123/kdiff3]*
>
> *Commits:*
>
> *
>
El dilluns, 29 de gener de 2024, a les 10:09:07 (CET), Jonathan Riddell va
escriure:
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 at 17:26, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
>
> wrote:
> > [ ] App packages in Flatpak, Snap, AppImages and Windows etc as
> > appropriate
> >
> > Not involved with any of those
Hi,
I'm still running a Qt5/KF5-based setup on my machine.
Is there a ready-to-use docker image/Dockerfile which I could use to work on a
KF6-based application, maybe something from KDE neon ?
Sorry for the maybe stupid question
Alex
On 29 January 2024 12:31:44 GMT, Harald Sitter wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 10:49 AM Carl Schwan wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, January 29, 2024 10:43:04 AM CET Harald Sitter wrote:
> > > do we really need it?
> > >
> > > systemd for example only has a spdx license header, resulting in much
>
On Samstag, 27. Januar 2024 18:22:35 CET Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> There are only 2 open checkboxes:
>
> [ ] Passing CI job for Reuse linting
>
> The challenge is that there are a number of old files where the contributors
> might be hard to contact for an explicit license statement
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 10:49 AM Carl Schwan wrote:
>
> On Monday, January 29, 2024 10:43:04 AM CET Harald Sitter wrote:
> > do we really need it?
> >
> > systemd for example only has a spdx license header, resulting in much
> > tidier file headers.
> >
> > I entirely fail to understand why we
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 10:38 PM Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2024-01-29, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> > This sort of comment makes me really sad. The All About the Apps goal,
> > which in principle is still ongoing, was an attempt to get KDE developers
> > to realise it was important not just to
On Monday, January 29, 2024 10:43:04 AM CET Harald Sitter wrote:
> do we really need it?
>
> systemd for example only has a spdx license header, resulting in much
> tidier file headers.
>
> I entirely fail to understand why we need to slap a FileCopyrightText
> on files. The copyright surely
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 9:43 AM Harald Sitter wrote:
>
> do we really need it?
>
> systemd for example only has a spdx license header, resulting in much
> tidier file headers.
>
> I entirely fail to understand why we need to slap a FileCopyrightText
> on files. The copyright surely applies
do we really need it?
systemd for example only has a spdx license header, resulting in much
tidier file headers.
I entirely fail to understand why we need to slap a FileCopyrightText
on files. The copyright surely applies whether or not I put the
FileCopyrightText there. The list is also just
On 2024-01-29, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> This sort of comment makes me really sad. The All About the Apps goal,
> which in principle is still ongoing, was an attempt to get KDE developers
> to realise it was important not just to write apps but to actually make
> them available to users, I find
On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 at 17:26, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
wrote:
> [ ] App packages in Flatpak, Snap, AppImages and Windows etc as appropriate
>
> Not involved with any of those packages/platforms, but I assume that
> checkbox
> is rather some kind of "nice to have", not blocking the process
13 matches
Mail list logo
