is part of KDE software, while Amarok does not follow the
KDE rules to be part of the official package. ( same release dates for
instance )
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Mark mark...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Lydia Pintscher
lydia.pintsc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Tomaz Canabrava tcanabr...@kde.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Mark mark...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Tomaz Canabrava tcanabr...@kde.org wrote:
juk should be a lightweigth music player, while amarok should be an
all-featured
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
A draft list was made of some areas for focus with names drafted in against
them:
...
* KJob - Qt-Addon for 5.1
Is the lack of manpower the reason or something else it is not planned
against 5.0 ? I have made some
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Ambroz Bizjak ambr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mark,
The localization stuff you're concerned about is happening below the
desktop file layer (in KDE's case, kconfigdata.h), and should work
automatically, i.e. if you ask for some key it will automatically give
you
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen o...@kde.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:26:03PM +0200, Mark Gaiser wrote:
In my opinion there should be a cross desktop system settings
application where the KDE implementation can use KCM and the gnome
implementation uses whatever
for KDE (which component? where? file?)
- Make patches for gnome (which component? where? file?)
Note: anyone is fine, not just Ben. Aiming at him since he started this mailing.
Regards,
Mark
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Ambroz Bizjak ambr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mark,
have you seen my proposed improvement on your suggestion?
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-develm=131149560119520w=2
I suggest that you consider it, because it would avoid having to
update the Freedesktop
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:50 PM, David Jarvie djar...@kde.org wrote:
On Mon, July 25, 2011 12:50 pm, Ambroz Bizjak wrote:
Hi Mark,
have you seen my proposed improvement on your suggestion?
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-develm=131149560119520w=2
I suggest that you consider it, because
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Ambroz Bizjak ambr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mark,
I've done some small research on what components would have to be
updated for the desktop-specific-names solution. I think that would
be:
- The Desktop Entry Specification,
http://standards.freedesktop.org
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, John Layt va escriure:
We discussed translation briefly at Platform 11 and Qt moving to or
supporting .po is something we really want to push for at QCS. I really
hope we have some people
On May 28, 2011, 9:29 a.m., David Faure wrote:
The handling of '/' could use KIO::encodeFileName instead, for consistency.
I agree about . and .. though ;)
Mark Gaiser wrote:
I wonder.. don't we need a isFilename function that checks if a
filename meets all the characters
thus returning false
when it starts with a / or for example contains a *? or being equal to . or ..
? That would make the use more portable since i can imagine other apps
benefiting from that (any app that needs to create a file or folder from user
input)
- Mark
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Christoph Feck christ...@maxiom.de wrote:
On Saturday 14 May 2011 21:42:18 Mark wrote:
Why is KDE having it's own image/pixmap caching classes
when the Qt lib also has them (QPixmapCache and QCache).
KDE's cache classes are on-disk caches and cross
guessing it's to hard and to much for just a spare time project so
don't expect anything.
Regards,
Mark
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:44 PM, David Edmundson
da...@davidedmundson.co.ukwrote:
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
On Friday, April 29, 2011 14:55:01 Markus Slopianka wrote:
Am Freitag 29 April 2011, 12:52:18 schrieb Lydia Pintscher:
Aaditya applied
stuff right now. :)
One thing I would like to add: The migration to Git will make such
undertakings much, much easier for us.
Trying to reorganize KDElibs with SVN would be a nightmare. With Git,
it might actually not be as much work as expected, if done right.
--
Mark Kretschmann
Amarok
201 - 216 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
