Am 07.12.2015 um 21:36 schrieb Thomas Lübking:
> On Montag, 7. Dezember 2015 17:22:47 CEST, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>
>> There are two sides, of course: if making it easier for a distribution
>> to package KDE software makes it harder for an application to be packaged
>> for another distribution, w
f: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114214/diff/
Testing
---
On Windows msvc2010 ;-)
Thanks,
Patrick Spendrin
ated)
---
On Windows msvc2010 ;-)
Thanks,
Patrick Spendrin
Startup()
[f:\dd\vctools\crt_bld\self_x86\crt\src\crtdll.c @ 526] at 0x54372630
...
I don't think it breaks anything.
Diffs
-
kdeui/windowmanagement/kwindowsystem_win.cpp e5b3a23
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114214/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Patrick Spendrin
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPUID#EAX.3D1:_Processor_Info_and_Feature_Bits .
Diffs
-
tier1/solid/src/solid/processor.h ce4f0e1
tier1/solid/src/solid/backends/shared/cpufeatures.cpp baa1af2
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108845/diff/
Testing
---
Windows
Thanks,
Patrick Spendrin
> On Aug. 12, 2013, 10:53 p.m., Patrick Spendrin wrote:
> > kioslave/thumbnail/CMakeLists.txt, line 160
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112009/diff/2/?file=178067#file178067line160>
> >
> > this could be moved out of the parentheses right?
>
>
> On Aug. 12, 2013, 10:53 p.m., Patrick Spendrin wrote:
> >
>
> Patrick Spendrin wrote:
> In general of course: thanks for your review request, one of the small
> nice overdue features!
> How does this work on Linux, e.g. do the changes to the .desktop f
> On Aug. 12, 2013, 10:53 p.m., Patrick Spendrin wrote:
> >
>
> Patrick Spendrin wrote:
> In general of course: thanks for your review request, one of the small
> nice overdue features!
> How does this work on Linux, e.g. do the changes to the .desktop f
> On Aug. 12, 2013, 10:53 p.m., Patrick Spendrin wrote:
> >
In general of course: thanks for your review request, one of the small nice
overdue features!
How does this work on Linux, e.g. do the changes to the .desktop file affect
Linux here?
lt;http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112009/#comment27799>
See above comment.
- Patrick Spendrin
On Aug. 11, 2013, 1:59 p.m., Andrius da Costa Ribas wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To r
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111291/#review35257
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Patrick Spendrin
On June 28, 2013, 6
...@kde.org.
Diffs
-
kdecore/localization/ktranscript.cpp 08ebf0e
kdecore/util/kexportplugin.h 775ed48
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105452/diff/
Testing
---
windows only.
Thanks,
Patrick Spendrin
> On Feb. 8, 2013, 6:23 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > What's the status on this? Should be discarded? Reworked?
>
> Patrick Spendrin wrote:
> It needs to be reworked, because I doubt that the issue has vanished by
> not looking at it.
Ok, steveire fix
ttp://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110462/#comment24561>
Why do we still fail this function (exit(255)), even if we actually are
still doing a meaningful action (activateWindowForProcess) here?
- Patrick Spendrin
On May 16, 2013, 10:21 a.m., Andre Heinecke
in emerge, there is another
one in there which might also interest you.
- Patrick Spendrin
On March 2, 2013, 4:54 p.m., Michel Ludwig wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visi
)
-
tier1/solid/src/solid/processor.h ce4f0e1
tier1/solid/src/solid/backends/shared/cpufeatures.cpp baa1af2
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108845/diff/
Testing
---
Windows
Thanks,
Patrick Spendrin
ly, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108845/#review32127
---
On Feb. 8, 2013, 1:09 a.m., Patrick Spendrin wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105452/#review26991
---
On July 5, 2012, 1:09 p.m., Patrick Spendrin wrote:
>
>
/solid/src/solid/backends/shared/cpufeatures.cpp baa1af2
tier1/solid/src/solid/processor.h ce4f0e1
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108845/diff/
Testing
---
Windows
Thanks,
Patrick Spendrin
baa1af2
tier1/solid/src/solid/processor.h ce4f0e1
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108845/diff/
Testing
---
Windows
Thanks,
Patrick Spendrin
Am 26.07.2012 05:43, schrieb Andrius da Costa Ribas:
> add_definitions(${KDE4_ENABLE_EXCEPTIONS}) seems to interfere with
> RC.exe when I try to add a kde4_add_app_icon.
> fatal error RC1106: invalid option: -EHsc
>
> any hint with that?
probably this has to be set in a different way then, someth
Am 26.07.2012 05:30, schrieb Andrius da Costa Ribas:
> Hello,
>
> In src/systemexception.h:
> return m_msg.toStdString().c_str();
> ^ my Qt copy was built with no support to toStdString, please consider
> changing it to:
> return m_msg.toLatin1();
Nope, your Qt copy was build with stl support, th
Am 25.07.2012 12:57, schrieb Jakob Gruber:
> I spent this morning setting up KDE Windows (thanks SaroEngels for all
> the help). The good news is that picmi
> compiles and runs without any changes to the source code (mingw and KDE
> 4.8).
>
> I have not set up a build with MSVC or KDE trunk, so I
Am 25.07.2012 10:13, schrieb Andras Mantia:
> On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 08:57:13 AM Laszlo Papp wrote:
>>> There was never a requirement for software that wants to be part of KDE to
>>> work on Windows, and I'd like to keep this as it is.
>>
>> Perhaps, but I can still raise my personal opinion,
/kexportplugin.h 775ed48
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105452/diff/
Testing
---
windows only.
Thanks,
Patrick Spendrin
Am 11.05.2012 22:33, schrieb Casper Clemence:
> I'm want to start a discussion, put an idea out there. I am also being
> pushy, on someone else's behalf.
>
> Although it may be a difficult discussion I think it would be a great
> shame to miss the opportunity to have it. I'm not trying to tell any
Am 20.12.2011 22:18, schrieb Dirk Mueller:
>
> Hi,
>
> As a preparation of KDE 4.8 RC1 I've created a KDE/4.8 branch for all
> released
> modules except for kdelibs, where I'm waiting for feedback if creating a 4.8
> branch makes sense for just one patch (see other mail today).
I have at le
platforms (xp, vista
& with mingw compilers) so that we have an idea which other problems are hidden
in here. For the time until the 4.9 release, I think we can apply this as a
patch against our builds.
- Patrick Spendrin
On Oct. 3, 2011, 1:25 a.m., Andrius da Costa Ribas w
--
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102758/
> ---
>
> (Updated Oct. 3, 2011, 1:25 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDE Base Apps, KDE Acce
ckporting would actually be good.
you can always just apply the patch by hand as we did with svn back then.
regards,
Patrick
>
>
>
> i5:~/src/kdelibs.was/kinit$ git show fd16288
>
> commit fd16288cedadf8ccf469df8a7be296763f5003d8
>
> Author: Patrick Spendrin
>
>
30 matches
Mail list logo
