Re: Flatpak jobs on KDE CI vs. continuous integration on main/master/devel branches

2024-02-08 Thread Volker Krause
On Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2024 19:48:27 CET Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Am Sonntag, 4. Februar 2024, 19:22:28 CET schrieb Ben Cooksley: > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 4:28 AM Friedrich W. H. Kossebau > > > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > ((cc:kde-frameworks-devel for heads-up, replies please

Re: Flatpak jobs on KDE CI vs. continuous integration on main/master/devel branches

2024-02-07 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Sonntag, 4. Februar 2024, 19:22:28 CET schrieb Ben Cooksley: > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 4:28 AM Friedrich W. H. Kossebau > > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > ((cc:kde-frameworks-devel for heads-up, replies please only to > > kde-core-deve)) > > > > I hit the problem that when working on a repo which

Re: Flatpak jobs on KDE CI vs. continuous integration on main/master/devel branches

2024-02-07 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Montag, 5. Februar 2024, 00:15:00 CET schrieb Julius Künzel: > > Besides all the resource costs to create flatpaks on master builds by > > default > every time, when those are usually not used by anyone anyway. > > It is important to mention that the pipelines on master usually publish to >

Re: Flatpak jobs on KDE CI vs. continuous integration on main/master/devel branches

2024-02-07 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Montag, 5. Februar 2024, 10:58:07 CET schrieb Ben Cooksley: > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 4:28 AM Friedrich W. H. Kossebau > > wrote: > > So, how to solve those problems? Did I miss something? > > Could flatpak builds on master branches be made on-demand rather? > > For the record, my rebuild of

Re: Flatpak jobs on KDE CI vs. continuous integration on main/master/devel branches

2024-02-05 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 4:28 AM Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Hi, > > ((cc:kde-frameworks-devel for heads-up, replies please only to > kde-core-deve)) > > I hit the problem that when working on a repo which would like to use > latest > KF development state to integrate some new KF API just

Re: Flatpak jobs on KDE CI vs. continuous integration on main/master/devel branches

2024-02-04 Thread Julius Künzel
> Besides all the resource costs to create flatpaks on master builds by default every time, when those are usually not used by anyone anyway. It is important to mention that the pipelines on master usually publish to the nightly repos on cdn.kde.org/flatpak I guess you were not aware of that

Re: Flatpak jobs on KDE CI vs. continuous integration on main/master/devel branches

2024-02-04 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 4:28 AM Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Hi, > > ((cc:kde-frameworks-devel for heads-up, replies please only to > kde-core-deve)) > > I hit the problem that when working on a repo which would like to use > latest > KF development state to integrate some new KF API just

Flatpak jobs on KDE CI vs. continuous integration on main/master/devel branches

2024-02-04 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Hi, ((cc:kde-frameworks-devel for heads-up, replies please only to kde-core-deve)) I hit the problem that when working on a repo which would like to use latest KF development state to integrate some new KF API just added in cooperation with that very repo wanting to use it, I cannot do so when