Re: New Feature for kdelibs (Was: The case for a kdelibs 4.8)

2011-11-15 Thread Kevin Kofler
Andrea Diamantini wrote: Ok, let's wait 18 months to see private browsing fixed. Going to update bug reports... Try nagging distros to backport your (or your contributors') patches. Unfortunately, it looks like trying to convince the kdelibs maintainers at KDE is a lost cause, as you can see

Re: New Feature for kdelibs (Was: The case for a kdelibs 4.8)

2011-11-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Andrea Diamantini wrote: Ok, let's wait 18 months to see private browsing fixed. Going to update bug reports... Try nagging distros to backport your (or your contributors') patches. Unfortunately, it looks like trying to convince the kdelibs

Re: New Feature for kdelibs (Was: The case for a kdelibs 4.8)

2011-11-15 Thread Kevin Kofler
Scott Kitterman wrote: It is probably worth a discussion on packagers to share cross-distro ideas about what kdelibs feature patches to ship with 4.8. Having some commonality at least among the distros seemslike a good idea to me. Please move this to kde-packager. It's off topic for

Re: New Feature for kdelibs (Was: The case for a kdelibs 4.8)

2011-11-13 Thread Andrea Diamantini
On Saturday 12 November 2011 12:26:11 Sebastian Kügler wrote: On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 15:28:48 andrea diamantini wrote: I think that every app using cookies would like to have this patch merged ASAP, expecially browsers. This will help/fix/improve features like private browsing

Re: New Feature for kdelibs (Was: The case for a kdelibs 4.8)

2011-11-12 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 15:28:48 andrea diamantini wrote: I think that every app using cookies would like to have this patch merged ASAP, expecially browsers. This will help/fix/improve features like private browsing and so on. So please don't let us wait for the big Universe

Re: New Feature for kdelibs (Was: The case for a kdelibs 4.8)

2011-11-10 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday, November 9, 2011 23:44:21 Andrea Diamantini wrote: 4.x is where I'm living/fighting/coding/writing now. for apps and workspaces, that is perfect. we don't want to disrupt app and workspace development while we get kdelibs prepped for the next major release. I'm sorry to say, in

Re: New Feature for kdelibs (Was: The case for a kdelibs 4.8)

2011-11-10 Thread Manuel Sputnick Nickschas
On Thursday 10 November 2011 10:14:58 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: On Wednesday, November 9, 2011 23:44:21 Andrea Diamantini wrote: And it will be based on the upcoming (not yet released) Qt 4.8. sure; but this is a non-relevant detail. Indeed... Thinking about frameworks without having yet a

Re: New Feature for kdelibs (Was: The case for a kdelibs 4.8)

2011-11-10 Thread andrea diamantini
2011/11/10 Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org On Wednesday, November 9, 2011 23:44:21 Andrea Diamantini wrote: 4.x is where I'm living/fighting/coding/writing now. for apps and workspaces, that is perfect. we don't want to disrupt app and workspace development while we get kdelibs prepped for

Re: New Feature for kdelibs (Was: The case for a kdelibs 4.8)

2011-11-10 Thread Thomas Lübking
Am Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:54:33 +0100 schrieb andrea diamantini adj...@gmail.com: 2011/11/10 Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org actually, Qt5 is irrelevant to most of the work that needs to be done in frameworks. we can, and are, working against Qt4 right now. most of the work is modularization

Re: New Feature for kdelibs (Was: The case for a kdelibs 4.8)

2011-11-09 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday, November 9, 2011 01:22:54 Dawit A wrote: That is fine for the kdelibs portion, but what do you suggest be done with the kde-baseapps portion of the patch ? Wait until 4.8 gets branched ? creating a frameworks branch in kde-baseapps may be a solution; we'll likely want to branch

Re: New Feature for kdelibs (Was: The case for a kdelibs 4.8)

2011-11-09 Thread andrea diamantini
I think that every app using cookies would like to have this patch merged ASAP, expecially browsers. This will help/fix/improve features like private browsing and so on. So please don't let us wait for the big Universe reordering to have it. :) 2011/11/8 Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org On Monday,

Re: New Feature for kdelibs (Was: The case for a kdelibs 4.8)

2011-11-09 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday, November 9, 2011 15:28:48 andrea diamantini wrote: I think that every app using cookies would like to have this patch merged ASAP, expecially browsers. This will help/fix/improve features like private browsing and so on. So please don't let us wait for the big Universe reordering

Re: New Feature for kdelibs (Was: The case for a kdelibs 4.8)

2011-11-09 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Wednesday 09 November 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: On Wednesday, November 9, 2011 15:28:48 andrea diamantini wrote: I think that every app using cookies would like to have this patch merged ASAP, expecially browsers. This will help/fix/improve features like private browsing and so on.

Re: New Feature for kdelibs (Was: The case for a kdelibs 4.8)

2011-11-09 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday, November 9, 2011 17:53:58 Alexander Neundorf wrote: But it will be not before Qt 5.0. the question is how long after, and the best answer is as little delay as possible. Qt 5.0 is scheduled for some time in 2012. Personally, I don't have a problem if not too many people work on

Re: New Feature for kdelibs (Was: The case for a kdelibs 4.8)

2011-11-09 Thread Andrea Diamantini
On Wednesday 09 November 2011 16:45:55 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: On Wednesday, November 9, 2011 15:28:48 andrea diamantini wrote: I think that every app using cookies would like to have this patch merged ASAP, expecially browsers. This will help/fix/improve features like private browsing and

Re: New Feature for kdelibs (Was: The case for a kdelibs 4.8)

2011-11-08 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Monday, November 7, 2011 19:32:15 Dawit A wrote: Well this is over a month too late, but I have a enhancement change for kcookiejar that needs to go into kdelibs/kioslave for KDE 4.8. The patch has actually been pending for a merge since KDE 4.6. See

New Feature for kdelibs (Was: The case for a kdelibs 4.8)

2011-11-07 Thread Allen Winter
On Monday 07 November 2011 10:18:15 AM Dawit A wrote: On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:54 AM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote: On Thursday 29 September 2011 20:01:00 Kevin Kofler wrote: But one of my points is that we need features too, not just bugfixes. Continuing 4.7.x releases solves the

Re: New Feature for kdelibs (Was: The case for a kdelibs 4.8)

2011-11-07 Thread Dawit A
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Allen Winter win...@kde.org wrote: On Monday 07 November 2011 10:18:15 AM Dawit A wrote: On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:54 AM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote: On Thursday 29 September 2011 20:01:00 Kevin Kofler wrote: But one of my points is that we need features