Re: Proposal for using gitlab for kdereview process

2024-02-07 Thread Harald Sitter
https://community.kde.org/Goals/All_about_the_Apps On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 11:16 PM Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > Long time ago, but perhaps there are still memories... > > Am Dienstag, 4. Juli 2023, 14:32:59 CET schrieb Jonathan Riddell: > > I've gone ahead an updated the Sanity checklist

Re: Proposal for using gitlab for kdereview process

2024-02-07 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Long time ago, but perhaps there are still memories... Am Dienstag, 4. Juli 2023, 14:32:59 CET schrieb Jonathan Riddell: > I've gone ahead an updated the Sanity checklist Having come across the checklist items * Passing KDE neon build * App packages in Flatpak, Snap, AppImages and Windows etc

Re: Proposal for using gitlab for kdereview process

2023-07-04 Thread Jonathan Riddell
I've gone ahead an updated the Sanity checklist and updated the kde review policy to ask people to make an Issue on gitlab labelled "KDE Review Request" https://community.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle#kdereview So you can now find kdereview requests at

Re: Proposal for using gitlab for kdereview process

2023-06-19 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Seems using issues is more intuitive so I'll ask for a global group label for issues and update the process docs for kdereview and incubator. Incubator suggestion is here https://discuss.kde.org/t/proposal-kde-invent-based-incubator-process/ Jonathan On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 at 08:27, David Redondo

Re: Proposal for using gitlab for kdereview process

2023-03-01 Thread David Redondo
So there are two new kdereview requests using gitlab issues now instead of my more complicated idea of merge requests. I imagined a MR to have advantages for codereview but an issue seems to be less complicated (no need to have an empty orphan branch, etc..), so maybe we should go with that.

Re: Proposal for using gitlab for kdereview process

2023-02-22 Thread Nate Graham
Overall I think it makes sense. The key players are all already on GitLab and it's where we do code review for established projects. Nate On 2/22/23 00:59, David Redondo wrote: Am Samstag, 18. Februar 2023, 12:02:38 CET schrieben Sie: I'm not convinced more paper work is going to help us

Re: Proposal for using gitlab for kdereview process

2023-02-22 Thread David Redondo
Am Samstag, 18. Februar 2023, 12:02:38 CET schrieben Sie: > > I'm not convinced more paper work is going to help us increase the number of > participants in the review process (which is imho the big issue), Hi Albert, I don't think it's will be paperwork, usually the mentioned checklist was

Re: Proposal for using gitlab for kdereview process

2023-02-18 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El divendres, 17 de febrer de 2023, a les 8:53:54 (CET), David Redondo va escriure: > Hi, > > I observed that participation in kdereview is fairly low. Usually only the > same few people participate (I have to admit this does not include me > either). Further follow up to their comments tends

Re: Proposal for using gitlab for kdereview process

2023-02-17 Thread Nicolas Fella
On 2/17/23 08:53, David Redondo wrote: Hi, I observed that participation in kdereview is fairly low. Usually only the same few people participate (I have to admit this does not include me either). Further follow up to their comments tends sometimes to be slow or is missed. Sometimes it fizzles

Proposal for using gitlab for kdereview process

2023-02-16 Thread David Redondo
Hi, I observed that participation in kdereview is fairly low. Usually only the same few people participate (I have to admit this does not include me either). Further follow up to their comments tends sometimes to be slow or is missed. Sometimes it fizzles out completely. I think nowadays we