On Wednesday 12 October 2011 19:38:11 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:47:54PM +0200, Dario Freddi wrote:
2011/10/12 Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org:
ok I have been thinking about it and have a new proposal:
* writing a kded module to only handle the screen locking
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 06:30:40PM +0200, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 17:34:10 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
on a more serious note, [h]ow do you handle the lock grace time?
this is actually not affected by the changes. Dim Display and turning off the
screen are decoupled
On Wednesday 12 October 2011 09:10:40 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
Of course KWin is a more complex application than others, but given
what we need in a screen locker the difference becomes marginal IMHO.
yes. one should consider decoupling the greeter from the core engine.
I myself have
2011/10/12 Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org:
On Wednesday 12 October 2011 09:10:40 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
Of course KWin is a more complex application than others, but given
what we need in a screen locker the difference becomes marginal IMHO.
yes. one should consider decoupling the
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:47:54PM +0200, Dario Freddi wrote:
2011/10/12 Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org:
ok I have been thinking about it and have a new proposal:
* writing a kded module to only handle the screen locking (grab keyboard and
mouse)
TBH, if you really care about not
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 15:33:39 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 14.55.29 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Monday 10 October 2011 20:02:07 Parker Coates wrote:
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 14:02, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
I want to request a security audit for the changes to ensure that
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 16:06:11 Andras Mantia wrote:
From here:
If KWin crashes without restarting privacy is leaked but the system is
hardly useable due to missing window manager. This situation can savely
be ignored as a corner case as KWin normaly restart.
This is not true, the
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 16:33:39 you wrote:
Once the screen locker crashes, security must be assumed
broken (if only by visual access).
Therefore the locker must not crash
full ack, we have to be at 0 crashes in KWin (which has to be our goal for
Wayland anyway ;-)
and if it does,
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 17:47:13 you wrote:
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:00:46 +0200
schrieb Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org:
that is a good suggestion. I will think about how I can add that.
Though if someone breaks by crashing kwin he is also able to remove
any log. So this could be just
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 17:34:10 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 03:55:15PM +0200, Thomas Lübking wrote:
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:33:39 +0200 schrieb Torgny Nyblom nyb...@kde.org:
Does this mean that I will be focred to use a screensaver with
password unlock? If so why
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 21:06:13 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 16:06:11 Andras Mantia wrote:
From here:
If KWin crashes without restarting privacy is leaked but the system is
hardly useable due to missing
11 matches
Mail list logo
