On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:12 AM, Luigi Toscano
wrote:
> On Friday 18 of March 2016 19:46:03 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> In terms of Reviewboard, there are no plans to import it's contents
>> into Phabricator, as the level of effort required is too high. Once we
>> are
On Friday 18 of March 2016 19:46:03 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> In terms of Reviewboard, there are no plans to import it's contents
> into Phabricator, as the level of effort required is too high. Once we
> are migrated to Phabricator for reviews, i'm proposing that everyone
> has 4 weeks to finish any
El divendres, 18 de març de 2016, a les 12:12:45 CET, Luigi Toscano va
escriure:
> On Friday 18 of March 2016 19:46:03 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > In terms of Reviewboard, there are no plans to import it's contents
> > into Phabricator, as the level of effort required is too high. Once we
> > are
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
wrote:
> Hi!
Hi Thomas,
>
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:46:03 +1300
> Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> We will be creating
>> a mechanism which will allow repositories following certain
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Luigi Toscano
wrote:
> Ben Cooksley ha scritto:
>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:12 AM, Luigi Toscano
>> wrote:
>>> On Friday 18 of March 2016 19:46:03 Ben Cooksley wrote:
In terms of Reviewboard, there are
Ben Cooksley ha scritto:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:12 AM, Luigi Toscano
> wrote:
>> On Friday 18 of March 2016 19:46:03 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>>> In terms of Reviewboard, there are no plans to import it's contents
>>> into Phabricator, as the level of effort required is
Hi!
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:46:03 +1300
Ben Cooksley wrote:
> We will be creating
> a mechanism which will allow repositories following certain naming
> conventions to be easily created by developers (although this will
> have to be done through the web interface).
And in