> On Aug. 21, 2011, 10:07 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Thanks Peter and Miroslav. The analysis looks correct, the pre-read part of
> > the patch looks good. I'm just wondering about using Unbuffered. If someone
> > installs a mimetype definition with multiple rules trying to match some
> > byt
> On Aug. 21, 2011, 10:07 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Thanks Peter and Miroslav. The analysis looks correct, the pre-read part of
> > the patch looks good. I'm just wondering about using Unbuffered. If someone
> > installs a mimetype definition with multiple rules trying to match some
> > byt
> On Aug. 21, 2011, 10:07 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Thanks Peter and Miroslav. The analysis looks correct, the pre-read part of
> > the patch looks good. I'm just wondering about using Unbuffered. If someone
> > installs a mimetype definition with multiple rules trying to match some
> > byt
> On Aug. 21, 2011, 10:07 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Thanks Peter and Miroslav. The analysis looks correct, the pre-read part of
> > the patch looks good. I'm just wondering about using Unbuffered. If someone
> > installs a mimetype definition with multiple rules trying to match some
> > byt
> On Aug. 21, 2011, 10:07 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Thanks Peter and Miroslav. The analysis looks correct, the pre-read part of
> > the patch looks good. I'm just wondering about using Unbuffered. If someone
> > installs a mimetype definition with multiple rules trying to match some
> > byt
> On Aug. 21, 2011, 10:07 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Thanks Peter and Miroslav. The analysis looks correct, the pre-read part of
> > the patch looks good. I'm just wondering about using Unbuffered. If someone
> > installs a mimetype definition with multiple rules trying to match some
> > byt
On Monday 22 August 2011 20:12:13 Miroslav Ľos wrote:
> > On Aug. 21, 2011, 10:07 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > > Thanks Peter and Miroslav. The analysis looks correct, the pre-read part
> > > of the patch looks good. I'm just wondering about using Unbuffered. If
> > > someone installs a mimetype de
> On Aug. 21, 2011, 10:07 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Thanks Peter and Miroslav. The analysis looks correct, the pre-read part of
> > the patch looks good. I'm just wondering about using Unbuffered. If someone
> > installs a mimetype definition with multiple rules trying to match some
> > byt
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102391/#review5872
---
Thanks Peter and Miroslav. The analysis looks correct, the pre-r
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102391/
---
Review request for kdelibs and David Faure.
Summary
---
If KMimeTypeR
10 matches
Mail list logo