---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101124/#review2745
---
This review has been submitted with commit
I didn't mean or say: don't add the DNT header (http is bloated anyway)
and i don't even oppose making it opt-out (the setting, ie. opt-in
tracking)
My general feeling is just that this is just some salvation promise and
Ossi's objection to not make it opt-out since otherwise the DNT won't
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 03:52:39PM -0400, Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
First, the idea that DNT affects most sites lively hood is something
that has already been dispelled. For most sites, there is no reason to
track your browsing habits to provide reasonable advertising on their
pages.
indeed. but
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101124/
---
(Updated April 17, 2011, 4:22 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen o...@kde.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:00:11PM +0200, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Friday 15 April 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:24:47AM -0400, Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
The configuration option is there to
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Maksim Orlovich m...@cornell.edu wrote:
Ah, I misread the default. But still, I don't think we want to send
DNT:0 if the user unchecks the checkbox, given how the label is worded
-- IMHO we wouldn't want to send the header at all.
That makes no sense especially
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:24:47AM -0400, Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Maksim Orlovich m...@cornell.edu wrote:
Ah, I misread the default. But still, I don't think we want to send
DNT:0 if the user unchecks the checkbox, given how the label is worded
-- IMHO we
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen o...@kde.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:24:47AM -0400, Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Maksim Orlovich m...@cornell.edu wrote:
Ah, I misread the default. But still, I don't think we want to send
DNT:0 if the
On Friday 15 April 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:24:47AM -0400, Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Maksim Orlovich m...@cornell.edu
wrote:
Ah, I misread the default. But still, I don't think we want to
send DNT:0 if the user unchecks the
Am 15.04.2011, 21:00 Uhr, schrieb Ingo Klöcker kloec...@kde.org:
that's not a very wise default. if too many people will use it (*),
the data miners will just ignore the standard, based on the rightful
claim that most people didn't even explicitly say they don't want to
be tracked.
Sorry, but
2011/4/15 Ingo Klöcker kloec...@kde.org:
On Friday 15 April 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:24:47AM -0400, Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Maksim Orlovich m...@cornell.edu
wrote:
Ah, I misread the default. But still, I don't think we want
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101124/
---
(Updated April 16, 2011, 4:41 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101124/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Summary
---
The attach patch adds GUI
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Maksim Orlovich m...@cornell.edu wrote:
Very cool. But re: original change. Are you sure we want to be sending
the opt-in header by default?
No. We are sending the opt-out header by default. The DNT: 1 which
will be sent, when the DoNotTrack is set to true (the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101124/
---
(Updated April 14, 2011, 5:08 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
15 matches
Mail list logo
