On Monday 22 August 2011 20:12:13 Miroslav Ľos wrote:
On Aug. 21, 2011, 10:07 a.m., David Faure wrote:
Thanks Peter and Miroslav. The analysis looks correct, the pre-read part
of the patch looks good. I'm just wondering about using Unbuffered. If
someone installs a mimetype definition
On Wednesday 24 August 2011 16:24:05 Cyril Oblikov wrote:
I wrote:
But did you at least run jobtest (in kdelibs/kio/tests) to make sure
that the new code doesn't break it? E.g. the creation of a dialog for sure
broke it, but now you've fixed that bit.
No, I didn't use tests. Are there
2011/8/9 Alexander Potashev aspotas...@gmail.com:
playground-libs/libkvkontakte moved to kdereview today. The next
target for this project is extragear/libs.
libkvkontakte has been in kdereview for more than two weeks already.
Is it OK to move it into extragear-libs now?
--
Alexander
A Dijous, 25 d'agost de 2011, Alexander Potashev vàreu escriure:
2011/8/9 Alexander Potashev aspotas...@gmail.com:
playground-libs/libkvkontakte moved to kdereview today. The next
target for this project is extragear/libs.
libkvkontakte has been in kdereview for more than two weeks
2011/8/25 Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org:
I thought you were going to get rid of the private members and use a d-pointer
instead?
What is the point of this? I think it will be OK to keep all class
members in the main (public) classes and use d-ptr only in case of
real necessity.
--
A Dijous, 25 d'agost de 2011, Alexander Potashev vàreu escriure:
2011/8/25 Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org:
I thought you were going to get rid of the private members and use a
d-pointer instead?
What is the point of this? I think it will be OK to keep all class
members in the main
2011/8/25 Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org:
The point is that usually you do not know what the library will end up doing
and by using d-pointers everywhere you make it easier for yourself to maintain
binary compatibility in the future.
But in the case that most classes won't grow in the future
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102425/#review6007
---
This review has been submitted with commit
Something I'm going to do, and I hope that some of the metalworkers will
follow is to get involved in the new platform (uStuff, NM, BlueZ...),
only by winning our relevance we will be able to control the platform again.
Also, I'd like to point something: In number of people I think that KDE
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102435/
---
Review request for KDE Base Apps and Peter Penz.
Summary
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102439/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Summary
---
So far knewstuff has gpg
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102439/#review6018
---
This review has been submitted with commit
12 matches
Mail list logo
