måndagen den 26 december 2011 01.36.47 skrev Albert Astals Cid:
Ok, so after half reading the walls of text and this email what i think
that actually what you and Rick suggest are different but not exclusive,
Rick suggests improving existing Qt classes so they can handle a few more
cases,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103529/#review9271
---
Regarding the contrast bug, please commit it. Not sure about
On Dec. 24, 2011, 8:38 a.m., David Faure wrote:
konqueror/client/kfmclient.cpp, line 386
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103524/diff/1/?file=44675#file44675line386
The code later on uses new KRun for the case of a user-defined
browser, given that KRun can handle that. Why not
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103529/#review9279
---
half a ship it:
i think you should commit the part that fixes
On Dec. 24, 2011, 8:38 a.m., David Faure wrote:
konqueror/client/kfmclient.cpp, line 386
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103524/diff/1/?file=44675#file44675line386
The code later on uses new KRun for the case of a user-defined
browser, given that KRun can handle that. Why not
On Dec. 24, 2011, 8:38 a.m., David Faure wrote:
konqueror/client/kfmclient.cpp, line 386
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103524/diff/1/?file=44675#file44675line386
The code later on uses new KRun for the case of a user-defined
browser, given that KRun can handle that. Why not
Hi all,
Can I submit the review below? By the way, is kdelibs still closed to
pushes?
Em Monday 19 December 2011, Lamarque Vieira Souza escreveu:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 22:39, Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Martin Klapetek
martin.klape...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Hi Martin,
snip
We're very short of releasing third version (0.3), which is also first
beta.
We plan to introduce Nepomuk
