On 4 November 2013 21:29, Weng Xuetian wen...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not about NoDisplay, plasmoids is a kind of widgets on KDE desktop, it
also use desktop file to store metadata, though it's not sit in
share/applications but some kde private folder. But each small widget is like
an small
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113630/#review43036
---
Didn't test.
But it doesn't have that fancy fade-blur-in
On Nov. 5, 2013, 10:21 a.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
ksplash/ksplashqml/themes/Classic/main.qml, line 29
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113630/diff/1/?file=209049#file209049line29
Do we even need this? It's not like the splash did or would ever be
resolution independent
I think
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113630/
---
(Updated Nov. 5, 2013, 10:42 a.m.)
Review request for kde-workspace.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113518/
---
(Updated Nov. 5, 2013, 10:49 a.m.)
Review request for kde-workspace and
Sven Brauch svenbra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Let's not make a fight of this. I think the point that some people
(including
me) didn't find the strategy for creating a standard quite optimal was
made,
and we should drop it now and focus on discussing the adoption of the
specification.
I want
On Monday, November 04, 2013 08:58:22 PM Richard Hughes wrote:
On 4 November 2013 20:56, Weng Xuetian wen...@gmail.com wrote:
Some questions:
1. What about non-application case?
In GNOME we only consider an application to have a desktop file
without NoDisplay=true. That's probably a
Some questions:
1. What about non-application case?
KDE plasmoid, and some kcm worked as a plugin in system setttings, some of
them also present a desktop, which doesn't theoratically an application, but I
think should be able to install from app center.
2. What if an application doesn't
On Tuesday, November 5, 2013 08:28:08 Richard Hughes wrote:
On 4 November 2013 21:29, Weng Xuetian wen...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not about NoDisplay, plasmoids is a kind of widgets on KDE desktop,
it
also use desktop file to store metadata, though it's not sit in
share/applications but
On 5 November 2013 12:06, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
plasmapkg -i pathtopackage
Sure, but what does that do? Does that copy a file in a special
directory or something?
Richard.
On Tuesday, November 5, 2013 12:08:57 Richard Hughes wrote:
On 5 November 2013 12:06, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
plasmapkg -i pathtopackage
Sure, but what does that do?
it should be of no concern to the installer. what it does is an implementation
detail. it may even change
On 5 November 2013 12:18, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
why do you need to know this? can AppStream not call external tools to do the
installation?
The way AppStream is generated in Fedora is we:
* Take the binary rpm file
* Explode it somewhere (without installing it)
* Parse the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113630/#review43052
---
ksplash/ksplashqml/themes/Classic/Theme.rc
On Nov. 5, 2013, 1:07 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
ksplash/ksplashqml/themes/Classic/main.qml, line 132
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113630/diff/2/?file=209134#file209134line132
This looks odd?
Yes, the last icon (the image itself) is actually bigger than the rest :S
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113642/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Repository: kdelibs
Description
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113644/
---
Review request for kdelibs and Aurélien Gâteau.
Repository: kdelibs
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113643/
---
Review request for kdelibs and Aurélien Gâteau.
Repository: kdelibs
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113644/#review43056
---
Looks good, thanks!
Note: you should use the kdeframeworks
On Nov. 5, 2013, 1:51 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Looks good, thanks!
Note: you should use the kdeframeworks group instead of the kdelibs
group for KF5 review requests.
Sorry for the inconvenience, I fixed my other reviews accordingly.
- David
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Allen Winter win...@kde.org wrote:
On Saturday, November 02, 2013 12:15:15 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Hi, yesterday i was talking with someone about the desktop file class we
have
in KDE, he tried to find its api by going to
api.kde.org
and typing
On Tuesday, November 5, 2013 12:57:28 Richard Hughes wrote:
On 5 November 2013 12:18, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
why do you need to know this? can AppStream not call external tools to do
the installation?
The way AppStream is generated in Fedora is we:
ok ... this is separate
On Nov. 4, 2013, 4:12 p.m., John Layt wrote:
I've asked on the Qt Development list about Qt 5 Solaris support. I'm told
it builds and works to some extent, and patches are welcome, but not
without having been tested on a real Solaris build first, which I have no
desire to do. I
On Nov. 5, 2013, 1:07 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
ksplash/ksplashqml/themes/Classic/main.qml, line 95
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113630/diff/2/?file=209134#file209134line95
Encapsulate the NumberAnimation into its own file. It should be easy to
change.
How would that go?
On Nov. 5, 2013, 1:07 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
ksplash/ksplashqml/themes/Classic/main.qml, line 95
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113630/diff/2/?file=209134#file209134line95
Encapsulate the NumberAnimation into its own file. It should be easy to
change.
Martin Klapetek
Hello everyone,
This is the minutes of the Week 43 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on
#kde-devel at 4pm Paris time.
Were present: afiestas, agateau, apol, d_ed, dfaure, dMaggot, mgraesslin,
Riddell, sandsmark, sebas, svuorela, teo and myself.
* afiestas is working toward completion of
On Tuesday 05 November 2013 17:13:01 Milian Wolff wrote:
On Tuesday 05 November 2013 17:04:47 Kevin Ottens wrote:
snip
* sandsmark cleaned up KTextEditorSpellingInterface;
I think this was discussed before, but I forgot it again :(
The KTextEditor stuff, will it stay in KDELibs for
On Tuesday 05 November 2013 17:20:27 Dominik Haumann wrote:
On Tuesday 05 November 2013 17:13:01 Milian Wolff wrote:
On Tuesday 05 November 2013 17:04:47 Kevin Ottens wrote:
snip
* sandsmark cleaned up KTextEditorSpellingInterface;
I think this was discussed before, but I forgot
2013/11/5 Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org:
On Tuesday, November 5, 2013 12:57:28 Richard Hughes wrote:
On 5 November 2013 12:18, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
why do you need to know this? can AppStream not call external tools to do
the installation?
The way AppStream is generated in
On Nov 5, 2013 12:49 PM, Weng Xuetian wen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, November 04, 2013 08:58:22 PM Richard Hughes wrote:
On 4 November 2013 20:56, Weng Xuetian wen...@gmail.com wrote:
Some questions:
1. What about non-application case?
In GNOME we only consider an application to
On 5 November 2013 17:12, Todd toddr...@gmail.com wrote:
For project_group/, I think it would be good to allow arbitrary groups
rather than limiting it to only a few recognized groups.
I think restricting it to the desktops specified in the menu-spec makes sense.
I think it would be good too
On Nov 5, 2013 5:18 PM, Todd toddr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 5, 2013 12:49 PM, Weng Xuetian wen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, November 04, 2013 08:58:22 PM Richard Hughes wrote:
On 4 November 2013 20:56, Weng Xuetian wen...@gmail.com wrote:
Some questions:
1. What about
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113644/
---
(Updated Nov. 5, 2013, 5:27 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On 5 November 2013 17:37, Todd toddr...@gmail.com wrote:
Define ChangeLog? You mean what changed between versions?
Yes, as well as the version number and date, probably.
I'd be open to ideas about this. Can you file an issue and we can talk
about possible ideas there.
In this case you can
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113518/#review43117
---
what exploit do you have in mind?
- Oswald Buddenhagen
On
On 5 November 2013 18:42, Todd toddr...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, but if this is going to be a separate file with outs own spec then it
is probably outside the scope of this project. But the two efforts could be
coordinated.
Well, I'm not saying it's out of scope for AppData, I'm simply saying
On Oct. 25, 2013, 7:58 p.m., Xuetian Weng wrote:
Could you also post a preview for French ? It should have 4 symbol on one
key, I'd like to how that looks.
Seems you didn't parse the led information? (It's ok to leave it there)
Some key name doesn't looks correct (F1 - F12), could
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113413/
---
(Updated Nov. 5, 2013, 8:22 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Runtime,
2013/11/5 Todd toddr...@gmail.com:
[...]
Looking at the spec, I have a few suggestions:
(I assume you mean the AppStream spec)
For project_group/, I think it would be good to allow arbitrary groups
rather than limiting it to only a few recognized groups. This is another
gatekeeper issue: no
Hi!
In order to solve the translation-issues: I think KDE could very well
use Scripty to insert translations into the AppData files. However, I
am currently thinking about adding a new element to specify a
gettext-domian to fetch trabslations from. The problem is that, in
order for the AppStream
2013/11/5 Matthias Klumpp matth...@tenstral.net:
Hi!
In order to solve the translation-issues: I think KDE could very well
use Scripty to insert translations into the AppData files. However, I
am currently thinking about adding a new element to specify a
gettext-domian to fetch trabslations
On Saturday 02 November 2013 15:06:26 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Saturday, November 2, 2013 14:35:10 Matthias Klumpp wrote:
What I see as truly invaluable in AppStream is standardizing the metadata
for Free software applications. It is something Bodega will undoubtedly
benefit from as well.
2013/11/5 Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com:
[...]
use cases (not to mention more general web based ones) unserviced.
Can you please clarify what AppStream is missing for mobile?
Ignoring the lack of UI (that’s fixable): non-repository based listings and
installation, anything that isn’t an
El Dimarts, 5 de novembre de 2013, a les 15:17:05, Aleix Pol va escriure:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Allen Winter win...@kde.org wrote:
On Saturday, November 02, 2013 12:15:15 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Hi, yesterday i was talking with someone about the desktop file class we
have
43 matches
Mail list logo
