Hello,
The need: 4-digit year support for short date formats to avoid issues like
"10/11/12" dates.
This is just my initial conclusion from for the Qt date format issue:
Hi,
Can't you just configure the CI to use Qt 5.10? I think it's not good to
hardcode an "overzealous" (for lack of a better word) Qt version in projects
that don't require them AND I think that one should support the current LTS
release in as many projects as possible as a general rule of
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:31 PM René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can't you just configure the CI to use Qt 5.10? I think it's not good to
> hardcode an "overzealous" (for lack of a better word) Qt version in projects
> that don't require them AND I think that one should support the current
On 03/12/18 09:46, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Ben
>
> I've been informed by the PIM developers that they would like to bump
> the dependency of the Qt version they use, from Qt 5.9 which it's on
> currently, to Qt 5.10.
>
> As a consequence, due to many KDE projects using PIM
Hi all,
I've been informed by the PIM developers that they would like to bump
the dependency of the Qt version they use, from Qt 5.9 which it's on
currently, to Qt 5.10.
As a consequence, due to many KDE projects using PIM libraries, their
dependency on Qt will also be effectively bumped. To
